PubMed · 15154752
Assessment of docking poses: interactions-based accuracy classification (IBAC) versus crystal structure deviations.
Abstract
Six docking programs (FlexX, GOLD, ICM, LigandFit, the Northwestern University version of DOCK, and QXP) were evaluated in terms of their ability to reproduce experimentally observed binding modes (poses) of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular targets. The accuracy of a pose was assessed in two ways: First, the RMS deviation of the predicted pose from the crystal structure was calculated. Second, the predicted pose was compared to the experimentally observed one regarding the presence of key interactions with the protein. The latter assessment is referred to as interactions-based accuracy classification (IBAC). In a number of cases significant discrepancies were found between IBAC and RMSD-based classifications. Despite being more subjective, the IBAC proved to be a more meaningful measure of docking accuracy in all these cases.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Romano T Kroemer, Anna Vulpetti, Joseph J McDonald, Douglas C Rohrer, Jean-Yves Trosset, Fabrizio Giordanetto, Simona Cotesta, Colin McMartin, Mats Kihlén, Pieter F W Stouten. Assessment of docking poses: interactions-based accuracy classification (IBAC) versus crystal structure deviations.. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci049970m
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.