PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15156183

ETO interacting proteins.

Abstract

The 8;21 translocation produces a fusion between the ETO gene and that encoding the myeloid transcription factor AML1. The AML1-ETO fusion substitutes the majority of the ETO protein for the coregulator recruitment domains of AML1. Biochemical analyses of ETO have led to the identification of numerous interacting proteins including many corepressors. Importantly, the proteins interacting with ETO are different from those of wild-type AML1, suggesting that altered coregulator recruitment underlies the oncogenic properties of AML1-ETO. The list of corepressors capable of binding ETO includes histone deacetylases (HDACs) and components of distinct HDAC core complexes. These investigations have provided mechanistic insight into corepressor recruitment by ETO and clues to the leukemogenic activity of AML1-ETO.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bruce A Hug, Mitchell A Lazar. 2004-05-24. ETO interacting proteins.. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207674

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

CDK12 inhibition reveals melanoma dependence on the RUNX1/CBFβ complex for genomic stability.

Cutaneous melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer, frequently driven by hyperactivation of the RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Cyclin-dependent kinase 12 (CDK12), a downstream effector of MAPK signaling, has emerged as a therapeutic target due to its essential role in transcriptional regulation and DNA damage repair. To identify vulnerabilities associated with CDK12 inhibition, we performed a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen and identified the Runt-related transcription factor RUNX1 and its cofactor CBFβ as synthetic lethal partners of CDK12. RUNX1 inhibition enhanced melanoma sensitivity to CDK12 inhibitors in a p53-independent manner, resulting in DNA damage accumulation and impaired repair capacity. Combined inhibition of CDK12 and RUNX1 suppressed melanoma growth in vivo. These findings identify RUNX1/CBFβ as a compensatory mechanism in CDK12-inhibited melanoma and define a synthetic lethal interaction with translational potential for combinatorial therapy.

Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit↗

Effects of the leukemia-associated AML1-ETO protein on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Insights into the pathogenesis of human leukemia have relied heavily on studies of the identified chromosomal translocations found in this group of malignant diseases. Acquired, balanced translocations in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) generally involve transcriptional regulatory genes, whereas in the myeloproliferative disorders tyrosine kinases are frequently involved. These rearrangements alter the function of at least one and often both of the involved genes. In this review, we focus on the AML1-ETO (a.k.a. RUNX1-ETO) fusion protein, which is found in t(8;21)+ AML. Expression of AML1-ETO in human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) preferentially enhances their maintenance, as opposed to their differentiation. The direct effects of AML1-ETO on human and murine HSCs, and the potentially cooperating events that may contribute to its leukemogenic properties, are discussed.

Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit↗

Point mutations in the RUNX1/AML1 gene: another actor in RUNX leukemia.

The RUNX1/AML1 gene is the most frequent target for chromosomal translocation in leukemia. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated point mutations in the RUNX1 gene as another mode of genetic alteration in development of leukemia. Monoallelic germline mutations in RUNX1 result in familial platelet disorder predisposed to acute myelogenous leukemia (FPD/AML). Sporadic point mutations are frequently found in three leukemia entities: AML M0 subtype, MDS-AML, and secondary (therapy-related) MDS/AML. Therapy-related leukemias resulting from anticancer treatments are not uncommon, and the incidence of RUNX1 point mutations appears comparable to the incidence of the t(8;21) AML M2 subtype and the inv(16) AML M4Eo subtype. Half of the point mutations in M0 cases are biallelic, although the frequency varies with ethnicity. Most of the RUNX1 mutations are clustered in the Runt domain and result in defective DNA binding but active beta-subunit binding, which is consistent with three-dimensional structural findings and may explain the dominant inhibitory effects. Unlike the classical tumor suppressor genes requiring biallelic inactivation, haploinsufficient RUNX1 is apparently leukemogenic. However, RUNX1 abnormalities per se are insufficient to cause full-blown leukemia. Intensive investigation of cooperating genetic alterations should elucidate leukemic mechanisms.

Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit↗