Sentinel lymph node mapping technique in colon cancer.

Sukamal Saha; Adrian G Dan; Thomas Beutler; David Wiese; Elie Schochet; Julio Badin; Timothy Branigan; Peter Ng; Nader Bassily; Doina David

doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.03.008

PubMed · 15190495

Sentinel lymph node mapping technique in colon cancer.

Sukamal Saha·Adrian G Dan·Thomas Beutler·David Wiese·Elie Schochet·Julio Badin·Timothy Branigan·Peter Ng·Nader Bassily·Doina David

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Current conventional surgical and pathological techniques substantially understage colon cancer. This is evidenced by the fact that a significant subset of patients who are stage I and II at the time of colectomy return with distant metastases and ultimately succumb to the disease within the next 5 years. The identification of more nodes within a specimen and the detailed analysis of lymph nodes with advanced pathological techniques such as immunohistochemistry and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) can improve the staging of colon cancer, but are also associated with tremendous financial, time, and labor constraints. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has provided an avenue of staging colon cancer with high success rates and accuracy rates, while maintaining cost- and time-effectiveness. The ability to reproduce these results is dependent on adherence to the technical details of the procedure, and thereby providing the pathologist with the true SLNs, upon which the advanced pathological studies can be applied. We report our experience of SLN mapping for colon tumors in 209 patients, elaborating on the materials used, technical details, pitfalls, and results of the procedure. Our results show a success rate of 100% (209/209) and an overall accuracy rate for predicting positive or negative metastatic disease of 96.2% (201/209). Nodal metastases were identified in 46.2% (85/184) of patients with invasive disease (stage T1 to T4). The SLN was the exclusive site of metastases in 38.8% (33/85) of these patients, and the nodal disease was detected only as micrometastases in 22.4% (19/85). The skip metastases rate (false negatives) was 9.4% (8/85). SLN mapping is a powerful tool for accurate staging of colon cancer with a high success rate. The upstaging associated with this procedure may reveal disease that might otherwise go undetected by conventional surgical and pathological methods. Those patients who are upstaged can then benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, which has been shown to improve survival of colon cancer patients with nodal disease by at least 33%.

Explore related subjects

Colonic Neoplasms Coloring Agents Fluorescein Humans Lymphatic Metastasis Neoplasm Staging Radiopharmaceuticals Rosaniline Dyes Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Sukamal Saha, Adrian G Dan, Thomas Beutler, David Wiese, Elie Schochet, Julio Badin, Timothy Branigan, Peter Ng, Nader Bassily, Doina David. 2004. Sentinel lymph node mapping technique in colon cancer.. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.03.008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Racial disparities in colon cancer. Primary care endoscopy as a tool to increase screening rates among minority patients.

Colon cancer is a condition whose far-reaching effects have been well documented nationally and within the state of South Carolina. Fortunately, the disease is amenable to both primary and secondary prevention through screening colonoscopy. Despite the conceptual simplicity of recommending colonoscopy, barriers exist to universal (or even widespread) screening. Currently the infrastructure necessary to achieve screening goals set by the American Cancer Society (ACS), the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), and the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) has not been established. At current rates of training gastroenterologists, the medical community will not be able to come close to achieving widespread screening. Given the discrepancy between the public health benefit of achieving the goals and the deaths that have occurred because of the resource shortfall, we propose alternative measures to screen the at-risk population for consideration. This need is most acute in the black community, in which where screening rates tend to be lower and polyps have been found to progress more quickly than among white populations. In South Carolina, one model has used primary care physicians as the labor force to provide routine screening colonoscopy for their own patients. This model makes screening much more accessible to minority patients, as the wait is shorter and the cost typically lower. In combination with a faith-based partnership with minority religious organizations, this model has begun to make needed inroads toward addressing the disparities associated with colon cancer. Cancer 2007. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.

Colonic Neoplasms↗

PubMed2007

Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We reviewed recent literature to assess the impact of hospital caseload, surgeon's caseload and education on long-term outcome following colorectal cancer surgery. METHOD: We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases for relevant literature starting from 1992. We selected hospital caseload, surgeon's caseload and surgeon's education, type of hospital, and surgeon's experience as variables of interest. Measures of outcome were recurrence-free survival and overall survival, and for rectal cancer frequency of permanent stoma. We reviewed the 34 studies according to tumour location: colonic cancer, rectal cancer, or colorectal cancer. We described the studies individually and performed a meta-analysis whenever it was considered appropriate. RESULTS: For colonic cancer, overall survival improved with increasing hospital caseload, odds ratio (OR) 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.28], and surgeon's education. For rectal cancer, overall survival improved with increasing hospital caseload, OR 1.38 (95% CI 1.19-1.60), and, possibly by surgeon' education and experience. Cancer-free survival was strongly influenced by surgeon's education. The colostomy rate was less in high caseload hospitals, OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.85). For colorectal cancer, overall survival improved with surgeon's education. CONCLUSION: The data have provided evidence that long-term survival following colorectal cancer surgery in general improved significantly with increasing hospital caseload and surgeon's education.

Colonic Neoplasms↗

PubMed2007

Management of duodenal involvement in locally advanced colonic carcinoma.

Removal of locally advanced right-sided colonic carcinoma involving the duodenum can be challenging. There are few data on the optimal surgical approach. Adjacent organ involvement is associated with a poor prognosis and may be classified as inoperable with patients having palliative bypass procedures rather than primary resection. Survival is however improved after en bloc resection of adjoining viscera compared with intestinal bypass. We present a variety of surgical options depending on the extent of local invasion and the debility of the patient.

Colonic Neoplasms↗