PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15206135

[Special proposal].

Abstract

Various kinds organs and tissues obtained from operations and autopsies are preserved for a certain period of time after obtaining samples for histopathological examination and are later disposed of. Some of these organs and tissues are occasionally used for research or educational purposes. Although consent is usually obtained from the patient or from the family of the deceased patient before performing an operation or autopsy, the use and disposal of residual organs and tissues have been performed by clinicians or pathologists without obtaining consent from the patient or from the family of the deceased patient. Now, however, consent must be obtained after sufficient explanation to the patient or to the family of the deceased patient for the storage, use and disposal of residual organs and tissues. It must be kept in mind that residual organs and tissues are parts of a human body and that these parts belong to the patient from which they were obtained or to the family of the deceased patient. These points are important and provide an ethical basis for use and disposal of residual organs and tissues.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuzo Hayashi. 2004. [Special proposal].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15206135/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Neuroethics--a future discipline?].

Progress in neuroscience leads not only to novel therapeutic opportunities but also raises several ethical problems. These problems are often subsumed under the term "neuroethics," of which the definition and purpose often remain unclear. We discuss the problems of informed consent, free will, sense of self, and personality in light of recent neuroscientific progress. Due to distinct categories and frames of reference, these philosophical-ethical terms cannot be limited only to the brain; the development of systematic relations is suggested. This accounts for the "special ethical position of the brain." It is concluded that only this sense can neuroethics account for the ethical complexity in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Ethics, Medical↗