PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15212938

CD44 variant isoforms associate with tetraspanins and EpCAM.

Abstract

The metastasizing subline of the rat pancreatic adenocarcinoma BSp73 expresses a set of membrane molecules, the combination of which has not been detected on non-metastasizing tumor lines. Hence, it became of interest whether these molecules function independently or may associate and exert specialized functions as membrane complexes. Separation of CD44v4-v7 containing membrane complexes in mild detergent revealed an association with the alpha3 integrin, annexin I, EpCAM, and the tetraspanins D6.1A and CD9. EpCAM and the tetraspanins associate selectively with CD44 variant (CD44v), but not with the CD44 standard (CD44s) isoform. The complexes are found in glycolipid-enriched membrane (GEM) microdomains, which are dissolved by stringent detergents, but the complexes are not destroyed by methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (MbetaCD) treatment, which implies that complex formation does not depend on a lipid-rich microenvironment. However, a complex-associated impact on cell-matrix and cell-cell adhesion as well as on resistance towards apoptosis essentially depended on the location in GEMs. Thus, CD44v-specific functions may well be brought about by complex formation of CD44v with EpCAM, the tetraspanins, and the alpha3 integrin. Because CD44v4-v7-EpCAM complex-specific functions strictly depended on the GEM localization, linker or signal-transducing molecules associating with the complex are likely located in GEMs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dirk-Steffen Schmidt, Pamela Klingbeil, Martina Schnölzer, Margot Zöller. 2004-07-15. CD44 variant isoforms associate with tetraspanins and EpCAM.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.02.023

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The case for routine use of adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a poor prognosis for most patients. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment, providing the only realistic hope of long-term survival. Even with optimal surgical management, 5-year survival averages 15% to 20% for resectable disease. Progress is being made, however. Currently, the benefits of postoperative therapy for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma appear clear, and recommendations for such therapy appear to us to be well justified. Additional benefit to patients awaits the development of new agents, molecular targeted drugs, and novel approaches such as immunotherapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Proposal for a new definition of true cardia carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It remains controversial whether cardia carcinoma should be categorized and treated as esophageal cancer or gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop a reasonable definition of cardia carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with Siewert type II carcinomas were divided into two subgroups: 25 patients with a tumor center within 1 cm of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) (type IIA) and 22 patients with tumor center 1-2 cm aboral of the EGJ (type IIB). Patients with subcardia carcinomas, 40 with invasion to the EGJ (type III) and 110 without (type IIIe-), were used as controls. RESULTS: The patients with type IIB carcinomas showed no different characteristics from those with type III or type IIIe- carcinomas, except for the stage of the disease. On the other hand, those with type IIA carcinomas were associated with a higher male/female ratio, higher incidences of elevated appearance, differentiated histology, and mediastinal node metastasis, and a significantly lower survival rate as compared with patients with subcardia carcinomas. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that type IIA is a significant prognostic determinant, but that type IIB is not. CONCLUSION: Type IIA carcinomas should be treated as true cardia carcinoma; type IIB as subcardia carcinoma. Our results should be confirmed by a prospective study.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Favorable indications for hepatectomy in patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer (LMGC) is dismal. The purpose of this study was to review our recent outcomes of hepatectomy for LMGC and to determine the suitable candidates for surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The outcomes of 37 patients with LMGC who underwent hepatectomy between 1990 and 2005 were assessed. No extrahepatic distant metastasis and feasibility of macroscopic curative resection were requisite indications for surgery. The prognostic values of clinicopathological factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There was no in-hospital mortality. The median survival time and overall 5-year survival rate after hepatectomy of the patients with LMGC were 31 months and 11%, respectively. Intrahepatic recurrence following hepatectomy was found in 23 patients (62%). Variables independently associated with poor survival were bilobar metastasis (P = 0.002, CI = 1.9-16.3) and a maximum tumor diameter of >or= 4 cm (P = 0.006, CI = 1.4-7.7). The depth of the primary tumor and the timing of metastasis were not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection for LMGC may be indicated in patients with unilobar metastasis and/or tumors less than 4 cm in diameter. Synchronous metastasis is not a contraindication for hepatectomy.

Adenocarcinoma↗