PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15214057

Kin-structured migration: causes and consequences.

Abstract

Migration among local populations classically has been seen as the principal process retarding genetic microdifferentiation. However, as Sewall Wright pointed out long ago, migration may also act as a random differentiating force. In fact, when migrants comprise a biological kin group, migration may be considered a component of genetic drift. The causes of kin-structured migration (KSM) lie in the common, if not universal, tendency for kin to associate and cooperate. However, similar to genetic drift, KSM has its greatest effect in smaller populations and is most apparent in low-density fission-fusion societies such as the Yanomamo of South America and the Semai of Malaysia, and less salient in higher density, low-mobility populations such as those of the New Guinea Highlands. The evolutionary consequences of KSM begin with increased genetic variation among populations. Such intergroup variation provides a basis for group selection. The origin of larger-scale geographic differentiation can arise from kin-structured migrant groups colonizing new regions. Waves of colonizing kin-structured founder groups may produce gene frequency clines, mimicking demic diffusion and natural selection. Finally, because kin structuring reduces the effective size of a population, it may be speculated that the extremely small effective size inferred for ancestral populations of Homo sapiens may be an artifact of kin-structured demographically larger populations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alan G Fix. Kin-structured migration: causes and consequences.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20044

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An academic genealogy on the history of American field primatologists.

In this paper, we present the academic genealogy of American field primatologists. The genealogy has been compiled to formally document the historical record of this young field. Data have been collected from three main sources: 1) e-mail surveys, 2) library and Internet research, and 3) verbal communication through forums such as American Association of Physical Anthropology meetings. Lineages of primatologists have been graphically displayed using Microsoft Visio. As of September 2005, 672 names and 239 affiliated universities, organizations and institutions have been recorded in 19 lineages. Five hundred and thirty-eight of the 672 names, 80.1%, are field primatologists. The Hooton/Washburn lineage is the largest; 60.6% of the recorded field primatologists are linked to this lineage. In addition, four of the five professors who have mentored a comparable number of field primatologists at American universities since Washburn are linked to the Hooton/Washburn lineage; and the school where Washburn mentored a majority of his students, UC-Berkeley, continues to have the highest overall graduation record for this subdiscipline. However, the field of primatology has been diversifying since the 1960s, and different universities are now responsible for graduating a substantial number of primatologists. We conclude that while the Hooton/Washburn lineage has remained remarkably homogenous in its anthropological focus, the field is also becoming increasingly enriched by primatologists who have had training in fields such as zoology, psychology, and ecology both in the United States and abroad.

Anthropology, Physical↗

Forensic palynology in Canada: an overview with emphasis on archaeology and anthropology.

Palynological analysis is shown from published and unpublished Canadian examples to be a useful tool in forensic investigation, although the technique is almost unknown and therefore under-utilized by forensic investigators. The techniques of pollen and spore identification and interpretation are continually improving, indicating that the potential for forensic applications is real. Focus in this paper is on an updated interpretation of palynological data that was presented during a trial involving a scientific test of oral history as part of a claim for aboriginal title to a large area of British Columbia (BC) (Delgamuukw versus the Queen). Although the original decision in British Columbia Supreme Court was decided in favor of the government defendants, an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada overturned the original decision, and established new principles and rights for aboriginal peoples.

Anthropology, Physical↗