Comparison of prosthetic valve hydrodynamic function: objective testing using statistical multilevel modeling.

Gillian M Bernacca; John H McColl; David J Wheatley

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15222295

Comparison of prosthetic valve hydrodynamic function: objective testing using statistical multilevel modeling.

Gillian M Bernacca·John H McColl·David J Wheatley

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The performance of novel prosthetic heart valves is assessed using in-vitro hydrodynamic function tests. The study aim was to examine the problem of objective discrimination of hydrodynamic performance to determine significant differences between valve designs, and illustrate proposed methodology using data collected from five different polyurethane tri-leaflet valve designs. METHODS: Two engineering designs were manufactured with leaflets of the same polyurethane (GE, LE); design L was manufactured using three further leaflet materials of differing material modulus (LL, L4, L5). Six valves were made in each design, each tested at five flow rates in a standard hydrodynamic test rig, with five test replications for each valve. The data were analyzed using multilevel statistical modeling methods, allowing simultaneous comparison of multiple regression lines describing valve performance. The multilevel model is hierarchical in structure, in this case with two levels of data, describing individual valves at level 2 and test replicates at level 1. In all cases, the multilevel model uses the hydrodynamic function measure of interest, e.g. mean pressure gradient or leakage, with logarithmic transformation as required as the dependent variable, Y. The independent variable, X, is, in all cases, the natural logarithm of the RMS flow measured through the valve. RESULTS: The two-design multilevel model enabled quantitative discrimination of designs GE and LE, showing that design GE had significantly better hydrodynamic function overall than design LE in this case (mean pressure gradient was estimated as 0.93 mmHg lower at low cardiac output, 14.74 mmHg lower at 9.6 l/min). The five-design multilevel model showed clearly the relatively poor hydrodynamic performance of designs L4 and L5 compared with others. The procedure was straightforward, and produced a statistical comparison among valve designs that is not easily achieved by other means. CONCLUSION: This methodology provides a useful means of objective assessment of valve function for valve developers. Variance estimates provided by the analysis also provide a basis for quality control of valve production and testing.

Explore related subjects

Equipment Failure Analysis Heart Valve Prosthesis Humans Kinetics Models, Cardiovascular Models, Theoretical Pressure Prosthesis Design Pulsatile Flow Regression Analysis Rheology Comparative Study Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Gillian M Bernacca, John H McColl, David J Wheatley. 2004. Comparison of prosthetic valve hydrodynamic function: objective testing using statistical multilevel modeling.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15222295/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2005

Use of failure mode and effects analysis in improving the safety of i.v. drug administration.

PURPOSE: Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was used to identify dosing and administration errors associated with i.v. medications and evaluate the effectiveness of subsequent system improvements. SUMMARY: A multidisciplinary medication safety team conducted an FMEA to identify and reduce common medication errors and selected wrong-dose errors for process improvement. In 2002, wrong-dose errors comprised 17% of all medication errors at the hospital (59 of 347 errors). The most common reason for administering the wrong dose was error in programming the i.v. infusion pump (41%). Potential errors (i.e., failures) identified were misinterpretation of the order, removing the wrong medication or wrong concentration of the correct medication, using the wrong diluent or drug to prepare the drip, and entering the wrong concentration or infusion rate on the pump. Errors in programming the i.v. infusion pump was the step in the medication-use process associated with the highest criticality index. Based on the results of the FMEA, two main interventions were performed. First, standard order sets were revised after streamlining the formulary and eliminating the use of unapproved abbreviations. Second, an i.v. pump with enhanced safety features was implemented. One-year follow-up data revealed that the number of medication errors related to dosing (wrong dose or incorrect infusion rate) had decreased slightly (from 59 in 2002 to 46 in 2003); however, a dramatic reduction was noted in the percentage of pump-related errors. In 2003, pump-related errors accounted for 22% of dosing errors, compared with 41% in 2002. CONCLUSION: Medication errors related to i.v. infusion pumps were reduced by conducting an FMEA and implementing the process changes needed.

Equipment Failure Analysis↗

PubMed2005

Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography?

A phantom study was performed in full-field digital mammography to investigate the opportunity and the magnitude of a possible dose reduction that would leave the image quality above the accepted thresholds associated with some classical phantoms. This preliminary work is intended to lay the groundwork for a future clinical study on the impact of dose reduction on clinical results. Three different mammography phantoms (ACR RMI 156, CIRS 11A and CDMAM 3.4) were imaged by a full-field digital mammography unit (GE Senographe 2000D) at different dose levels. Images were rated by three observers with softcopy reading and scoring methods specific to each phantom. Different types of data analysis were applied to the ACR (American College of Radiology) and the other two phantoms, respectively. With reference to the minimum acceptance score in screen/film accreditation programmes, the ACR phantom showed that about 45% dose reduction could be applied, while keeping the phantom scores above that threshold. A relative comparison was done for CIRS and CDMAM, for which no threshold is defined. CIRS scoring remained close to the reference level down to 40% dose reduction, the inter- and intra-observer variability being the main source of uncertainty. Contrast-detail curves provided by CDMAM overlapped down to 50% dose reduction, at least for object contrast values ranging between 30% and 3%. This multi-phantom study shows the potential of further reducing the dose in full-field digital mammography beyond the current values. A common dose reduction factor around 50% seems acceptable for all phantoms. However, caution is required before extrapolating the results for clinical use, given the limitations of these widely used phantoms, mainly related to their limited dynamic range and uniform background.

Equipment Failure Analysis↗

PubMed2005

Fatigue sensitivity of Y-TZP to microscale sharp-contact flaws.

The strength degrading effects of sharp-contact damage are examined for Y-TZP ceramic plates bonded to a plastic substrate. Contacts are made with Vickers and Berkovich diamond indenters at low loads (0.1 N to 100 N) in the ceramic lower surfaces prior to bonding to the substrates. The indentations remain in the subthreshold region, that is, without visible corner radial cracks, over the lower region (< 10 N) of the load range. A concentrated load is then applied sinusoidally to the ceramic upper surface, with the loading axis centered on the subsurface indentation flaw, thereby subjecting the flaw to cyclic tension. Relative to polished surfaces, the indentations diminish the single-cycle strength by an amount that increases with increasing indentation load. The critical number of cycles required to cause failure from the indentation flaws is then measured at specified maximum lower surface tensile stresses. At each indentation load, the strength of the ceramic plates diminishes with increased cycling. The scale of degradation is compared with that from previous studies on Y-TZP surfaces containing larger-scale surface damage: sandblast damage, as used in dental crown preparation; and blunt-contact trauma from a spherical indenter at 3000 N. These other damage modes are shown to be equivalent in their strength-degrading capacity to diamond pyramid indentations in the microscale load range 0.1 N to 1 N, attesting to the highly deleterious nature of sharp particulate contacts. The mechanism of fatigue is considered in terms of microcrack evolution within the indentation damage zone.

Equipment Failure Analysis↗