PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1525385

Compliance with a nonrecapping needle policy.

Abstract

Compliance with nonrecapping needle policies is poor. Accidental needlestick injuries account for up to 80% of reported occupational needle exposures, and 45% of needlestick injuries occur at recapping. To determine the degree of compliance with in-house nonrecapping and needle disposal policies, the authors undertook an unannounced survey of needles disposed in designated sharps disposal containers and, via a questionnaire, surveyed attitudes to policies. The results show between 46 and 77% of needles were being recapped with 9 to 20% of bloodstained needles recapped before disposal. Recapping devices were rarely used and two-handed recapping techniques predominated. Highest rates of recapping were seen in intensive care, intermediate care and medical care units. Common reasons for recapping include inability to dispose immediately of needles properly, and sharps containers being too far away. Awareness of the risks of recapping was widespread with over 90% of respondents having been instructed in proper needle disposal techniques. While few health care professionals disagreed with non-recapping and needle disposal policies, many--for various reasons--persist in hazardous needle disposal practices.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Dalton, J Blondeau, E Dockerty, C Fanning, L Johnston, S LeFort-Jost, S MacDonald. 1992. Compliance with a nonrecapping needle policy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1525385/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The Age-related Macular Degeneration Alliance International commissioned a review of the literature on quality of life (QoL) in macular degeneration (MD) with a view to increasing awareness of MD, reducing its impact and improving services for people with MD worldwide. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases, conference proceedings and key journal hand search checks. The resulting 'White Paper' was posted on the AMD Alliance website and is reproduced here. REVIEW: MD is a chronic, largely untreatable eye condition which leads to loss of central vision needed for tasks such as reading, watching TV, driving, recognising faces. It is the most common cause of blindness in the Western world. Shock of diagnosis, coupled with lack of information and support are a common experience. Incidence of depression is twice that found in the community-dwelling elderly, fuelled by functional decline and loss of leisure activities. Some people feel suicidal. MD threatens independence, especially when comorbidity exacerbates functional limitations. Rehabilitation, including low vision aid (LVA) provision and training, peer support and education, can improve functional and psychological outcomes but many people do not receive services likely to benefit them. Medical treatments, suitable for only a small minority of people with MD, can improve vision but most limit progress of MD, at least for a time, rather than cure. The White Paper considers difficulties associated with inappropriate use of health status measures and misinterpretation of utility values as QoL measures: evidence suggests they have poor validity in MD. CONCLUSION: There is considerable evidence for the major damage done to QoL by MD which is underestimated by health status and utility measures. Medical treatments are limited to a small proportion of people. However, much can be done to improve QoL by early diagnosis of MD with good communication of prognosis and continuing support. Support could include provision of LVAs, peer support, education and effective help in adjusting to MD. It is vital that appropriate measures of visual function and QoL be used in building a sound evidence base for the effectiveness of rehabilitation and treatment.

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice↗