PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15253998

Why don't stage-based activity promotion interventions work?

Abstract

Despite the well-described benefits of regular physical activity, around 70% of adults in the UK fail to meet current activity recommendations. Interventions based on the Transtheoretical, or Stages of Change, Model of behaviour change have been proposed as one potentially effective method of promoting physical activity levels. However, two recent reviews have found little evidence that individualized stage-based activity promotion interventions are any more effective than control conditions in promoting long-term adherence to increased levels of physical activity. Possible reasons for this are: that exercise behaviour is a more complex group of behaviours than currently recognized; that many algorithms for determining current stage of activity change have not been validated; that exercise behaviour is determined by a number of factors not addressed by stage-based interventions; that the stages of change model encourages focus on stage progression which is not always associated with behaviour change; and that truly stage-based interventions are highly complex requiring more than one level of development and evaluation--a challenge that has not yet been met. Thus, stage-based activity promotion interventions may simplify exercise behaviour beyond what is useful for practitioners and health promoters. Paradoxically, stage-based activity promotion interventions that have been developed to date may have failed to appreciate the true complexity of the task.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Adams, M White. 2004-07-14. Why don't stage-based activity promotion interventions work?. https://doi.org/10.1093/her%2Fcyg105

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure.

Conducting emergency research in the out-of-hospital and emergency department setting is a challenge because of the inability of patients to provide informed consent in many situations. Federal guidelines allowing research under an exception from informed consent for emergency research have been established (21 CRF 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure, 2 required components of obtaining this exception, are seen by many as a barrier to resuscitation research. This article will provide a brief overview of the history of the exception from informed consent for emergency research and summarize our methods recently used to successfully complete community consultation and public disclosure for a trial evaluating 2 devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area.

Attitude to Health↗