PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15298150

Current concepts on Riedel thyroiditis.

Abstract

Riedel thyroiditis (RT) is an uncommon form of chronic thyroiditis in which the thyroid gland is replaced by fibrous tissue. The etiologic mechanisms underlying RT are unclear: the prevailing view is that it is part of a generalized fibroinflammatory process also involving other organs. The clinical manifestations of RT are protean, often resembling malignancy owing to goiter of remarkably hard consistency. Physical examination, laboratory analysis, cytology, and imaging features are not useful for differentiating between RT and neoplastic diseases or the fibrous variant of Hashimoto thyroiditis in the presurgical evaluation of patients. Histologic examination is necessary to establish the final diagnosis of RT. The present article reviews the most recent concepts about etiologic mechanisms, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of RT

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Giampaolo Papi, Virginia A LiVolsi. 2004. Current concepts on Riedel thyroiditis.. https://doi.org/10.1309/nuu88vafr9yehkna

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Validation of a low-cost, liquid-based screening method for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to validate a low-cost, liquid-based method for cervical cancer screening. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective, split-sample comparison of 300 liquid-based cervical cytology samples from a group of 150 human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive women and 150 women from low-risk general gynecology clinics whose specimens were screened via standard liquid-based methodology as part of routine care. Residual samples from each specimen were used to prepare a slide using a novel, inexpensive manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology. These slides were screened by a cytotechnologist and abnormal cases were reviewed by a pathologist. Final diagnoses from the manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology slides were compared with the original diagnoses and available cervical biopsy data. RESULTS: There was good overall agreement between the manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology and original cytology diagnoses (76.3% agreement; kappa = 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.59). Using available biopsy data to determine the accuracy of each method to identify high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, the manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology method was found to have a higher sensitivity (71.4% versus 57.1%) and lower specificity (82.1% versus 89.7%). The slightly higher referral rate to colposcopy using the manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology method was limited to women from the low-risk general gynecology clinics (16.7% versus 12.0%, P = .05). CONCLUSION: The low-cost manual membrane method of liquid-based cytology cervical cytology method is comparable with a standard commercial method. Consequently, it may be of value in alternative screening strategies in resource-limited settings.

Cytodiagnosis↗

Application of cytology and molecular biology in diagnosing premalignant or malignant oral lesions.

Early detection of a premalignant or cancerous oral lesion promises to improve the survival and the morbidity of patients suffering from these conditions. Cytological study of oral cells is a non-aggressive technique that is well accepted by the patient, and is therefore an attractive option for the early diagnosis of oral cancer, including epithelial atypia and squamous cell carcinoma. However its usage has been limited so far due to poor sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing oral malignancies. Lately it has re-emerged due to improved methods and it's application in oral precancer and cancer as a diagnostic and predictive method as well as for monitoring patients. Newer diagnostic techniques such as "brush biopsy" and molecular studies have been developed. Recent advances in cytological techniques and novel aspects of applications of scraped or exfoliative cytology for detecting these lesions and predicting their progression or recurrence are reviewed here.

Cytodiagnosis↗

The Warwick system of prospective workload allocation in cellular pathology--an aid to subspecialisation: a comparison with the Royal College of Pathologists' system.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines on staffing and workload for histopathology and cytopathology departments was published by the Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) in July 2003. In this document, a system is provided whereby the workload of a cellular pathology department and individual pathologists can be assessed with a scoring system based on specialty and complexity of the specimens. A similar, but simplified, system of scoring specimens by specialty was developed in the Warwick District General Hospital. The system was based on the specimen type and suggested clinical diagnosis, so that specimens could be allocated prospectively by the laboratory technical staff to even out workload and support subspecialisation in a department staffed by 4.6 whole-time equivalent consultant pathologists. METHODS: The pathologists were asked to indicate their reporting preferences to determine specialist reporting teams. The workload was allocated according to the "prospective" Warwick system (based on specimen type and suggested clinical diagnosis, not affected by final diagnosis or individual pathologist variation in reference to numbers of blocks, sections and special stains examined) for October 2003. The cumulative Warwick score was compared with the "retrospective" RCPath scoring system for each pathologist and between specialties. Four pathologists recorded their time for cut-up and reporting for the month audited. RESULTS: The equitable distribution of work between pathologists was ensured by the Warwick allocation and workload system, hence facilitating specialist reporting. Less variation was observed in points reported per hour by the Warwick system (6.3 (range 5.5-6.9)) than by the RCPath system (11.5 (range 9.3-15)). CONCLUSIONS: The RCPath system of scoring is inherently complex, is applied retrospectively and is not consistent across subspecialities. The Warwick system is simpler, prospective and can be run by technical staff; it facilitates even workload distribution throughout the day. Subspecialisation within a small-sized or medium-sized department with fair distribution of work between pathologists is also allowed for by this system. Reporting times among pathologists were shown by time and motion studies to be more consistent with Warwick points per hour than with RCPath points per hour.

Cytodiagnosis↗