PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15301618

Simultaneous cognitive operations in working memory after dual-task practice.

Abstract

The authors tested the hypothesis that with adequate practice, people can execute 2 cognitive operations in working memory simultaneously. In Experiment 1, 6 students practiced updating 2 items in working memory through 2 sequences of operations (1 numerical, 1 spatial). In different blocks, imperative stimuli for the 2 sequences of operations were presented either simultaneously or sequentially. Initially, most participants experienced substantial dual-task costs. After 24 sessions of practice, operation latencies for simultaneous presentation were equal to the maximum of times for the 2 operations in the sequential condition, suggesting perfect timesharing. Experiment 2 showed that a reduction of dual-task costs requires practice on the combination of the 2 updating tasks, not just practice on each individual task. Hence, the reduction of dual-task costs cannot be explained by shortening or automatization of individual operations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Klaus Oberauer, Reinhold Kliegl. 2004. Simultaneous cognitive operations in working memory after dual-task practice.. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.689

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Décalage in infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: converging evidence from action tasks.

In the present research, 6-month-old infants consistently searched for a tall toy behind a tall as opposed to a short occluder. However, when the same toy was hidden inside a tall or a short container, only older, 7.5-month-old infants searched for the tall toy inside the tall container. These and control results (1) confirm previous violation-of-expectation (VOE) findings of a décalage in infants' reasoning about height information in occlusion and containment events; (2) cast doubt on the suggestion that VOE tasks overestimate infants' cognitive abilities; and (3) support recent proposals that infants use their physical knowledge to guide their actions when task demands do not overwhelm their limited processing resources.

Cognition↗