PubMed · 1531319
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L W Lauste. 1992. Abdominal cramp.. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800790142
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of spinal loading in healthy volunteers. OBJECTIVES: To measure the bending and compressive forces acting on the lumbar spine, in a range of postures, when unknown loads are delivered unexpectedly to the hands. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Epidemiologic studies suggest that sudden and unexpected loading events often lead to back injuries. Such incidents have been shown to increase back muscle activity, but their effects on the compressive force and bending moment acting on the spine have not been fully quantified. Furthermore, previous investigations have focused on the upright posture only. METHODS: In this study, 12 volunteers each stood on a force plate while weights of 0, 2, 4, and 6 kg (for men, 40% less for women) were delivered into their hands in one of three ways: 1) by the volunteer holding an empty box with handles, into which an unknown weight was dropped; 2) by the same way as in 1, but with volunteer wearing a blindfold and earphones to eliminate sensory cues; or 3) by the volunteer sliding a box of unknown weight off a smooth table. Experiments were carried out with participants standing in upright, partially flexed, and moderately flexed postures. Spinal compression resulting from muscular activity was quantified using electromyographic signals recorded from the back and abdominal muscles. The axial inertial force acting up the long axis of the spine was calculated from the vertical ground reaction force. The bending moment acting on the osteoligamentous spine was quantified by comparing measurements of lumbar curvature with the bending stiffness properties of cadaveric lumbar spines. RESULTS: The contribution from abdominal muscle contraction to overall spinal compression was small (average, 8%), as was the axial inertial force (average, 2.5%), and both were highest in the upright posture. Peak bending moments were higher in flexed postures, but did not increase much at the moment of load delivery in any posture. Peak spinal compressive forces were increased by 30% to 70% when loads were suddenly and unexpectedly dropped into the box, and by 20% to 30% when they were slid off the table, as compared with loads simply held statically in the same posture (P < 0.001). The removal of audiovisual cues had little effect. CONCLUSIONS: Sudden and alarming events associated with manual handling cause a reflex overreaction of the back muscles, which substantially increases spine compressive loading. Manual handling regulations should aim to prevent such events and limit the weight of objects to be lifted.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY DESIGN: The distribution of the nerve action potentials reflexively elicited by electrical stimulation of the lumbar spine was investigated in rats. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the relation between the lumbar spine and other body regions that compose the spinal reflex. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The hypothesis was that the ventral portion of the L5-L6 disc spatially corresponds to the groin. METHODS: In Experiments 1 and 2, wire electrodes were placed 1) in the ventral and dorsal portions of the disc, facet joint, and muscle fascia at L5-L6, and 2) in the ventral portions of L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-L6, and L6-S discs. A needle electrode was inserted in the L5-L6 disc by 0.4-mm increments, and action potentials were serially recorded from the genitofemoral nerve. RESULTS: Experiments 1 and 2: Reflex action potentials were elicited in the iliohypogastric (T13 and L1), ilioinguinal (L1), and genitofemoral (L2) nerves. Experiment 1: Stimulation of the disc induced reflex discharges significantly more frequently than stimulation of the facet joint and muscle fascia. Experiment 2: The more cranial the disc stimulated, the more frequently the reflex discharge was induced in the iliohypogastric nerve. Experiment 3: The depth of stimulation did not influence the size of the reflex action potential. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation of the lumbar disc and facet joint induced reflex discharges in the nerves to the lower abdominal regions. It was postulated that the reflex discharges are related to muscle contraction resulting in referred pain in the loin and groin.