PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15315664

Aniso-accommodation as a possible factor in myopia development.

Abstract

It is shown that the asymmetric convergence caused by the changes in fixation required to read a line of text results in unequal accommodation demands to the two eyes. Since experimental evidence suggests that the required aniso-accommodation response cannot be achieved, and that accommodation in both eyes tends to match the response to the lower of the two demands, in general the retinal image in at least one eye must be out-of-focus. The resultant blur increases as the eccentricity of gaze is increased and the reading distance is reduced, and also depends on the posture and position of the head, together with the balance between eye and head movements. By analogy with the results of animal experiments, it is argued that the defocused retinal imagery involved in reading and similar tasks could be a factor in myopia development, particularly in children who adopt unfavourable reading postures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W N Charman. 2004. Aniso-accommodation as a possible factor in myopia development.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00205.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effect of blur adaptation on blur sensitivity in myopes.

Although blur adaptation in myopia has been investigated, knowledge regarding its effect on blur sensitivity remains unknown. In the present study, changes in three blur thresholds (i.e., noticeable, bothersome, and non-resolvable blur) were assessed monocularly after 1h of blur adaptation in myopes. A Badal optical system was used to present either an isolated 20/50 Snellen E or 20/50 lines of text, with the full text field used in the latter condition for all blur judgments. Eight visually normal adult myopes were tested with paralyzed accommodation. All subjects exhibited blur adaptation, with a significant improvement in group mean visual acuity of -0.16 LogMAR. There was a consistent and concurrent significant decrease of 0.15-0.19 D in all blur thresholds for the isolated 20/50 E. However, there was no significant effect of blur adaptation on blur thresholds for the 20/50 text, with large intersubject variability evident. The enhanced blur sensitivity for the isolated E target may in part be attributed to the increased visual resolution following blur adaptation. Differences found in the blur thresholds for the two targets may be related to a variety of neuroperceptual phenomena, in particular lateral masking.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Contrast detection in noise with positive and negative defocus in myopes.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that myopes produce an asymmetrical loss in contrast sensitivity with positive and negative defocusing lenses at low-medium spatial frequencies (1-7c/deg) compared to non-myopes. The measurement of contrast detection in noise allows any given loss in visual sensitivity to be attributed to two components namely sampling efficiency and/or equivalent noise. Previous work has also shown that sampling efficiency gives an indication of the neural effects and in the absence of sampling efficiency changes, changes in equivalent noise levels are considered to be due to optical factors. We investigate whether the asymmetrical loss shown by myopes to defocus can be explained by changes in sampling efficiency or equivalent noise, or both. METHODS: Contrast thresholds in four different levels of externally added noise were measured in five myopic and five non-myopic subjects for Gabors of 3c/deg. Measurements were obtained under cycloplegia with 0 D, +/-0.50 D, and +/-1.00 D defocusing lenses. RMS wavefront aberrations were also measured using a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. RESULTS: In the absence of noise, there was no significant difference in contrast sensitivity without defocus between myopes and emmetropes. When sampling efficiency and equivalent noise were measured from Contrast Detection in Noise functions, analysis of variance showed no significant difference in sampling efficiency between myopes and non-myopes (p=0.145). Myopes showed maximum levels of equivalent noise with +1.00 D defocus, decreasing to a minimum with -1.00 D defocus (p=0.009). Non-myopes showed a symmetrical increase in equivalent noise from zero for both positive and negative defocus. A significant correlation was found between equivalent noise and the total RMS of Wavefront aberrations of the eye (p=0.026). CONCLUSION: Optical factors explain the observed differences in contrast sensitivity with positive and negative defocus between myopes and non-myopes.

Accommodation, Ocular↗