PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15322914

Deep brain stimulation.

Abstract

During the last decade deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a routine method for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), leading to striking improvements in motor function and quality of life of PD patients. It is associated with minimal morbidity. The rationale of targeting specific structures within basal ganglia such as the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) is strongly supported by the current knowledge of the basal ganglia pathophysiology, which is derived from extensive experimental work and which provides the theoretical basis for surgical therapy in PD. In particular, the STN has advanced to the worldwide most used target for DBS in the treatment of PD, due to the marked improvement of all cardinal symptoms of the disease. Moreover on-period dyskinesias are reduced in parallel with a marked reduction of the equivalent daily levodopa dose following STN-DBS. The success of the therapy largely depends on the selection of the appropriate candidate patients and on the precise implantation of the stimulation electrode, which necessitates careful imaging-based pre-targeting and extensive electrophysiological exploration of the target area. Despite the clinical success of the therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of high-frequency stimulation are still not fully elucidated. There is a large amount of evidence from experimental and clinical data that stimulation frequency represents a key factor with respect to clinical effect of DBS. Interestingly, high-frequency stimulation mimics the functional effects of ablation in various brain structures. The main hypotheses for the mechanism of high-frequency stimulation are: (1) depolarization blocking of neuronal transmission through inactivation of voltage dependent ion-channels, (2) jamming of information by imposing an efferent stimulation-driven high-frequency pattern, (3) synaptic inhibition by stimulation of inhibitory afferents to the target nucleus, (4) synaptic failure by stimulation-induced neurotransmitter depletion. As the hyperactivity of the STN is considered a functional hallmark of PD and as there is experimental evidence for STN-mediated glutamatergic excitotoxicity on neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), STN-DBS might reduce glutamatergic drive, leading to neuroprotection. Further studies will be needed to elucidate if STN-DBS indeed provides a slow-down of disease progression.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sorin Breit, Jörg B Schulz, Alim-Louis Benabid. 2004-08-19. Deep brain stimulation.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-004-0936-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation: a review of the published literature.

Hardware-related complications have been commonly described after deep brain stimulation. We searched the PubMed database using the key words 'adverse effects' and 'deep brain stimulation'. Out of 254 studies, we identified 10 articles that primarily addressed morbidity and hardware-related adverse effects in 922 patients. The most commonly reported hardware-related complications were infections (6.1% of the patients), migration or misplacement of the leads (5.1% of the patients), lead fractures (5.0% of the patients), and skin erosion (1.3% of the patients). Refinements in surgical technique, technological improvements, and a greater experience with the procedures will likely decrease the incidence of hardware-related side effects in the future.

Deep Brain Stimulation↗

Conventional MRI is inadequate to delineate the relationship between the red nucleus and subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: An understanding of the relationships between the anterior commissure-posterior commissure line (AC-PC), the subthalamic nucleus (STN), and red nucleus (RN) is imperative if these structures are to be used for targeting in deep brain stimulation. Currently, these relationships are incompletely understood and difficult to assess using conventional MRI. We examined the location and relationships of the STN and the RN to the AC-PC line and to each other in order to provide a greater understanding of their utility when targeting the STN, and the consistency of these anatomic relationships when examined using conventional MRI. METHODS: A total of 52 STN and RN in 26 patients with Parkinson's disease were evaluated on T2-weighted MR images. The anterior and posterior commissures and the border coordinates of the STN and RN were derived using frame coordinates. The distances from the midcommissural point (mcp) to the centers of the STN and RN, the diameters for each nucleus, and the distances between the nuclei were calculated in the x-, y-, and z-axes. RESULTS: The mean AC-PC length was 26.1 +/- 1.3 mm. The distance from the mcp to the center of the STN was 10 +/- 0.7 mm in the x-axis, 0.2 +/- 0.7 mm in the y-axis, and 3.3 +/- 0.9 mm in the z-axis. The distance from the mcp to the center of the RN was 4.7 +/- 0.6 mm in the x-axis, -5.9 +/- 1.0 mm in the y-axis, and 6.1 +/- 1.3 mm in the z-axis. The distance between the STN and RN was 2.3 +/- 0.7 mm in the x-axis, 2.1 +/- 1.0 mm in the y-axis, and -0.2 +/- 1.3 mm in the z-axis. CONCLUSIONS: Although recent studies imply that the RN can be used as a relatively consistent marker for the position of the STN, the present data suggest otherwise. These data indicate that a single targeting method may be inadequate given the resolution of conventional MRI, and that it is imperative to use multiple anatomical measurements when targeting the STN for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Deep Brain Stimulation↗