PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15325485

Debriefing: its evolution and current status.

Abstract

Debriefing, like trauma counseling, and even grief counseling, has been taken up as an instant solution. Some suggest it is a part of the trauma industry. It may be seen as something to hold onto in the face of disaster or other chaos, because it offers the security of a structure, some sense of control over what to do to help when one wishes to undo what has happened, help others and the self, to make meaning of a horrific or shocking experience. The need to pursue a way of responding suggests that those who would offer help fear being overwhelmed, or do not trust their normal compassionate, protecting, and comforting responses. It would be sad if these spontaneous, caring, and altruistic reactions that so bind human society in times of tragedy were devalued or put aside, for they, ultimately are the beginning of the healing process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Beverley Raphael, Sally Wooding. 2004. Debriefing: its evolution and current status.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2004.03.003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The effectiveness of a peer support camp for siblings of children with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Siblings of children with cancer have higher levels of psychological stress and adaptational difficulties compared to siblings of healthy children and children with other chronic illness. This is the first study to report on the mental health of Australian siblings of children with cancer and examines the effects of a therapeutic peer support camp-Camp Onwards, as an intervention. PROCEDURE: A protocol, designed to reduce levels of distress, improve social competence, and improve knowledge about the impact of cancer and its treatment was developed. Siblings (n=26) 8-13 years were assessed using standardised self-report measures pre and post intervention and at -8 weeks follow-up with: the Behaviour Assessment for Children (BASC) (Reynolds & Kamphaus, 1992), Self Perception Profile for Children (SPP-C) (Harter, 1985), Sibling Perception Questionnaire (SPQ) (Carpenter & Sahler, 1991). RESULTS: Change was measured using paired t tests. At pre-test, 40% of the sample demonstrated increased levels of emotional distress when compared to the normal population. Post intervention, siblings reported lower levels of distress demonstrated by decreased anxiety (P=0.01) and positive changes in the Self Report of Personality [BASC] (P=0.00). Improved social competence was noted in the interpersonal domain of the SPQ (P=0.01) and also greater social acceptance scores on the SPP-C (P=0.01). Improved knowledge about the impact of cancer and its treatment was evidenced by significant reductions in the fear of disease domain on the SPQ (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Siblings who attended Camp Onwards demonstrated improved mental health outcomes that were sustained at follow-up, demonstrating its effectiveness as an intervention strategy in supporting sibling adjustment.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Internalizing problem behavior and family environment of children with burns: a Dutch pilot study.

The psychosocial development of children with burns is at risk. Children with health care issues tend to develop internalizing problems. Several areas of protective or risk factors were composed into a conceptual model on how internalizing problems might develop or might be prevented after getting burned. The purpose of this study was to explore the relation between post burn internalizing problems on the one hand and child characteristics, burn characteristics and the family environment on the other hand. Data have been collected from 28 mothers and 27 fathers of children with burns (N=29) in six burn centers in The Netherlands and Belgium. The age of the participating children ranged from 2 to 14, TBSA ranged from 1 to 42%. Parents reported problem behavior on the child behavior checklist (CBCL). Three scales of the family environment scale (FES) have been used to explore family conflict, family cohesion and family control. Relations between a clinical level of internalizing problems, reported in 25% of the sample and the family environment were found.

Adaptation, Psychological↗