PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15341698

Predicting hemorrhage using preoperative coagulation screening assays.

Abstract

Each year in the United States, millions of units of fresh frozen plasma and platelets are transfused. A substantial proportion of these units are given to nonbleeding patients to "decrease the risk" of bleeding at the time of invasive procedures. The decision to transfuse is frequently triggered by an elevated prothrombin time (PT; international normalized ratio ) or activated partial thromboplastin time test result or by a depressed platelet count. This review summarizes published studies on the extent to which mild to moderate abnormalities of common laboratory tests of hemostasis reflect an increased risk of bleeding at the time of invasive bedside procedures, including central line placement, liver biopsy, paracentesis, thoracentesis, gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy, renal biopsy, bronchoscopy and transbronchial lung biopsy, and lumbar punctures. The poor predictive value of the PT (INR) is understandable in the context of the design and performance of this assay. Whether mild to moderate abnormalities of commonly used laboratory tests have any clinically relevant predictive value as appropriate triggers for prophylactic transfusions before invasive procedures should be investigated in formal randomized clinical trials.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Walter H Dzik. 2004. Predicting hemorrhage using preoperative coagulation screening assays.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15341698/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗