PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15346035

Outer table craniotomy for frontal sinus mucocele.

Abstract

Variants of the external osteoplastic flap procedure or endoscopy have been used to approach the frontal sinus mucocele. The authors introduce a modified external approach for radical resection of the mucocele. Using the bicoronal skin incision, the skin flap exposed the right upper orbital rim. The outer table craniotomy was then performed to expose the frontal sinus cavity while carefully preserving the inner table, with radical removal of the mucocele mucosa. The sinus cavity was irrigated with hyper-oxide solution to ensure adequate destruction of possible residual mucosa. The fascia of the frontalis muscle was split, with one part placed into the mucocele cavity to plug the nasofrontal duct. The advantages of the procedures for mucocele removal include clear visualization of the frontal sinus for radical resection of the mucosa, preservation of the inner table avoiding dura manipulation, prevention of central nervous system infection, possibly lower rates of recurrence, prevention of mucosal ingrowth by plugging of the nasofrontal ducts with fascia, and favorable cosmetic outcome. The disadvantages are more intensive surgery comparable to the endoscopic approaches and execution difficulties when the frontal mucocele is small. Additional clinical studies are needed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of this procedure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kuo-Wei Wang, Huan-Chen Hsu, Kang Lu, Han-Jung Chen, Cheng-Loong Liang. 2004. Outer table craniotomy for frontal sinus mucocele.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200409000-00033

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Scalp reconstruction.

Scalp reconstruction after oncologic resection can be challenging. Wide surgical resections, in combination with co-morbid conditions such as infected alloplastic material, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, or devascularized bone after craniotomy necessitate healthy, vascularized tissues for reconstruction. Although primary closure is feasible in some cases, the mainstay of treatment involves local tissue rearrangement with or without split thickness skin grafting. In addition, free tissue transfer is an important adjunct to therapy in patients with poor local tissues. Careful analysis of the defect and local tissues can help tailor the method of reconstruction and result in satisfactory closure in a majority of patients. Current techniques used for scalp reconstruction after surgical ablation are the subject of this review.

Craniotomy↗

Comparison of craniotomy and craniectomy in patients with acute subdural haematoma.

Despite the increasing acceptance of craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury, the value of early decompressive craniectomy in patients with acute subdural haematoma is still under debate. In this retrospective study, we reviewed 180 patients with traumatic acute subdural haematoma, 111 of whom were treated with haematoma evacuation via craniotomy and 69 of whom were treated with early decompressive craniectomy. Due to the higher incidence of signs of herniation for patients in the craniectomy group, the mortality rate in this group was higher than that in the craniotomy group (53% vs. 32.3%). However, overall there was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups. Age and clinical signs of herniation were significantly associated with an unfavourable outcome, regardless of the type of surgery. Decompressive craniectomy did not seem to have a therapeutic advantage over craniotomy in traumatic acute subdural haematoma.

Craniotomy↗