PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15347322

Skin imaging: is it clinically useful?

D Rallan·C C Harland
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Non-invasive skin imaging techniques have proliferated over the last decade. Whilst most have a research role, some are routinely used in dermatology clinics. Of these, the skin surface microscope (dermatoscope), a diagnostic aid for pigmented lesions, has had most clinical impact. Such devices, when linked to a videomicroscope for computer analysis, have been dubbed as 'mole scanners'. Mole scanners are increasingly available on a commercial basis even though computer diagnosis of pigmented lesions is currently no better than diagnosis by human experts. Meanwhile, other imaging techniques, such as high-resolution ultrasonography, spectroscopy and optical coherence tomography, may yet find a role in diagnosis and disease monitoring.

Explore related subjects

DermoscopyDiagnostic ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicroscopy, ConfocalSkin DiseasesSpectrophotometryTomography, Optical CoherenceUltrasonographyJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Rallan, C C Harland. 2004. Skin imaging: is it clinically useful?. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.2004.01602.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Atypical melanosis of the foot showing a dermoscopic feature of the parallel ridge pattern.

A 62-year-old male Turkish patient had a pigmented lesion on the sole with a 10-year history. It was an asymmetrical macular lesion with an irregular border and irregular brown pigmentation and had a diameter of 1.2 cm x 1.7 cm. Dermoscopy revealed a parallel ridge pattern and an abrupt cut-off of pigmentation on the upper edge. Histologically lentiginous hyperplasia decorated by innocent melanocytes and scattered melanocytic proliferation with slight to moderate cytological atypia were seen. Atypical melanocytes were very scattered and it was insufficient to call it a melanoma in situ. A second finding was a microvascular proliferation located in the papillary dermis. There was no sign of regression such as fibrous tissue or host reaction. Atypical melanosis of the foot has rarely been reported in the published work, which are from Japan and Korea. This case is presented to emphasize the significance of this rare entity which has recently been reported to be a very early phase of acral melanoma.

Dermoscopy↗
PubMed2006

Office capillaroscopy in systemic sclerosis.

The aims of this study are to assess the reliability of two office techniques, the ophthalmoscope and the Dermlite dermatoscope, and to detect nailfold capillaroscopy abnormalities in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Two separate studies were performed. In the first, the nailfolds of two fingers on one hand of 13 SSc patients and two normals were examined by four rheumatologists using an ophthalmoscope. In the second, the nailfolds of the two fingers of each hand of six SSc patients and two normals were examined by six rheumatologists with a Dermlite dermatoscope. Widefield capillary microscopy was performed by one observer in the ophthalmoscope study to assess validity. The examiners determined the presence or absence of dilated loops, giant capillary loops, and/or avascular areas on each digit. The kappa coefficient was calculated to demonstrate agreement. With the ophtalmoscope, the inter-observer kappa coefficients were 0.43, 0.54, and 0.19; the average intra-observer agreements were 0.61, 0.56, and 0.31; and the ophthalmoscope-microscope agreement were 0.63, 0.52, and <0.1 for dilated capillaries, giant capillaries, and avascular areas, respectively. With the dermatoscope, the kappa values for inter-observer reliability were 0.63, 0.40, and 0.20; and intra-observer reliability was 0.71, 0.55, and 0.40 for dilated capillaries, giant capillaries, and avascular areas, respectively. The ophthalmoscope and the dermatoscope provide moderate to substantial reliability to detect the presence of giant and dilated capillaries but poor inter-observer agreement for avascular areas. The ophthalmoscope is valid when compared to the microscope for detecting giant or dilated capillaries. We conclude that these techniques are useful office tools to detect capillary abnormalities in SSc.

Dermoscopy↗