PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15357729

New PCR-based methods for yeast identification.

Abstract

AIMS: To characterize reference yeast strains and identify indigenous strains isolated from wine fermentations by PCR methods. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared several PCR techniques for yeast identification. We used oligonucleotide primers that are complementary to (i) intron splice sites, (ii) REP and (iii) ERIC elements to produce PCR fingerprints that display specific patterns between the different yeast species. These three techniques were used to characterize 41 reference yeast strains belonging to 15 different species and to identify 40 indigenous strains isolated from grape must and wine fermentations. Species-specific banding patterns were obtained with the three PCR-techniques with different degrees of intraspecific differentiation depending on the method. By comparing the PCR fingerprints of unknown isolates with those produced by reference strains, we identified yeast strains isolated from an industrial wine fermentation. CONCLUSIONS: All three PCR techniques are rapid, reliable and simple methods of yeast identification. As far as we know, this is the first time that the primers designed for amplifying repetitive elements in bacteria have been successfully used in yeast. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Industry needs rapid, reliable and simple methods of yeast identification. The proposed PCR techniques will allow to achieve this objective.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N Hierro, A González, A Mas, J M Guillamón. 2004. New PCR-based methods for yeast identification.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02369.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Run-specific limits of detection and quantitation for STR-based DNA testing.

STR-based DNA profiling is an exceptionally sensitive analytical technique that is often used to obtain results at the very limits of its sensitivity. The challenge of reliably distinguishing between signal and noise in such situations is one that has been rigorously addressed in numerous other analytical disciplines. However, an inability to determine accurately the height of electropherogram baselines has caused forensic DNA profiling laboratories to utilize alternative approaches. Minimum thresholds established during laboratory validation studies have become the de facto standard for distinguishing between reliable signal and noise/technical artifacts. These minimum peak height thresholds generally fail to consider variability in the sensitivity of instruments, reagents, and the skill of human analysts involved in the DNA profiling process over the course of time. Software (BatchExtract) made publicly available by the National Center for Biotechnology Information now provides an alternative means of establishing limits of detection and quantitation that is more consistent with those used in other analytical disciplines. We have used that software to determine the height of each data collection point for each dye along a control sample's electropherogram trace. These values were then used to determine a limit of detection (the average amount of background noise plus three standard deviations) and a limit of quantitation (the average amount of background noise plus 10 standard deviations) for each control sample. Analyses of the electropherogram data associated with the positive, negative, and reagent blank controls included in 50 different capillary electrophoresis runs validate that this approach could be used to determine run-specific thresholds objectively for use in forensic DNA casework.

DNA Fingerprinting↗