PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15360946

Developing an interaction-centered evaluation tool for distance education.

Abstract

Web-based distance instruction is growing in popularity. As more courses and programs go online, instructional methods and technologies are changing to meet new demands. These courses and instructional methods need be evaluated to determine their quality and to aid in their development. An instrument that measures the quality of student interaction within courses could play a useful role in this evaluation. The objective of this project was to produce an interaction-centered evaluation tool for distance education. We developed items for the evaluation tool based on a review of the literature and interviews with distance education faculty. We then conducted a measurement study to determine the instrument's validity and reliability. Fifty-five students in seven medical informatics courses participated in this study. Questionnaire items were included or rejected based on their fit with underlying theoretical constructs. In conclusion, the Web-based evaluation tool developed in this project measures student perception of quality of course interactions with demonstrated validity and reliability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

John A Perrine, Judith R Logan. 2004. Developing an interaction-centered evaluation tool for distance education.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15360946/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of a novel case-based training program (d3web.Train) in hematology.

The new media such as the internet and digital imaging offer new opportunities in medical education. In addition to conventional lectures, we developed a case-based simulation training program of 17 hematology cases using the novel training system d3web.Train. We evaluated the assessment of this internet course by medical students, as well as their results in the hematology exam. From a group of 150 students, 47 worked through at least one case and solved 435 cases in total; in average, these students solved 9.5 cases. Eighteen different students filled in a questionnaire about the training system and 68 questionnaires about individual cases. The main results were the students found the cases very helpful (1.5+/-0.6 on a scale from 1=very helpful to 5=not at all), the training system very good (1.4+/-0.5 on a scale from 1 to 6), and want to work with it further (1.2+/-0.4 on a scale from 1 to 5). During the final examination, those 16 students who answered that they had solved more than 5 from the 17 cases scored significantly better (two-sided t test, p<0.01) in the hematological part of the exam than those 34 students solving 0 to 5 cases. To our knowledge, this is the first student evaluation of a case-based training program in general hematology. The d3web.Train system offers a new and great tool for creating a training program in a reasonable amount of time, because it is able to process available patient records.

Computer-Assisted Instruction↗

Who owns your work?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Computer-Assisted Instruction↗