PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15362635

[Sensitivity analysis in ecological modeling].

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis is used to qualitatively or quantitatively apportion the variation of model output to different source of variation. It is a very useful tool in model parameterization and calibration, and has important ecological significance by identifying the governing factors for a certain ecological process simulated. There are two schools of sensitivity analysis, local sensitivity analysis and global sensitivity analysis. The former examines the local response of the output(s) by varying input parameters one at a time, holding other parameters to a central value; and the latter examines the global response (averaged over the variation of all the parameters) of model output(s) by exploring a finite (or even an infinite) region. Since it is very easy to conduct local sensitivity analysis, it is very popular in ecological models. However, local sensitivity analysis is not computationally effective, because it can only get the sensitivity of a single parameter at a time. It can not take into consideration the effect of interaction of different parameters. Additionally, the value of other parameters will affect the sensitivity of the parameter specified. In view of this, global sensitivity analysis is increasingly preferred to local sensitivity in recent years. However, for most of the ecological modeling study published in Chinese, only local sensitivity analysis is conducted. To provide a toolbox of alternative sensitivity analysis algorithms for ecological model development in future study, we reviewed the main methods of both local sensitivity analysis and global sensitivity analysis, including one at a time method, multivariate regression, Morris' method, Sobol's method, Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Analysis, and Extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Analysis. Based on the state-of-the-art research on sensitivity analysis, the sensitivity of the interaction between two or more than two model parameters, the sensitivity of common model parameters in a set of models, and the sensitivity analysis in spatially explicit landscape model simulation were identified as the key areas and difficulties of future study on sensitivity analysis in ecological modeling.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chonggang Xu, Yuanman Hu, Yu Chang, Yan Jiang, Xiuzhen Li, Renchang Bu, Hongshi He. 2004. [Sensitivity analysis in ecological modeling].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15362635/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An ecologic study of cancer mortality rates in Spain with respect to indices of solar UVB irradiance and smoking.

There is increasing evidence that vitamin D reduces the risk of many types of cancer. Geographic variations in cancer mortality rates in Spain are apparently linked to variations in solar ultraviolet (UV) irradiances and other factors. Cancer mortality rates for 48 continental Spanish provinces for 1978-1992 were used in linear regression analyses with respect to mortality rates for latitude (an index of solar UVB levels), skin cancer (an index of high cumulative UVB irradiance), melanoma (an index related to solar UV irradiance and several other factors) and lung cancer (an index of cumulative effects of smoking). The 9 cancers with mortality rates significantly correlated with latitude for 1 or both sexes were brain, gastric, melanoma, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), pancreatic, pleural, rectal and thyroid cancer. Inverse correlations with latitude were found for laryngeal, lung and uterine corpus cancer. The 17 cancers inversely correlated with NMSC are bladder, brain, breast, colon, esophageal, gallbladder, Hodgkin's lymphoma, lung, melanoma, multiple myeloma, NHL, ovarian, pancreatic, pleural, rectal, thyroid and uterine corpus cancer. The 16 correlated with melanoma are bladder, brain, breast, colon, gallbladder, leukemia, lung, multiple myeloma, NHL, ovarian, pancreatic, pleural, prostate, rectal, renal and uterine corpus cancer. The results for lung cancer were in accordance with the literature. These results provide more support for the UVB/vitamin D/cancer hypothesis and indicate a new way to investigate the role of solar UV irradiance on cancer risk. They also provide more evidence that melanoma and NMSC have different etiologies.

Ecology↗

Ecosystem approaches and health in Latin America.

Important environmental changes that have become increasingly pronounced in the last two centuries and that are seriously affecting human health require the development of integrated and participatory scientific approaches that can result in proposals for institutional and public policy changes. The purpose of this article is to offer some elements that can contribute to a line of reflection based on studies with ecosystem approaches in the Latin America context. The authors begin with a brief description of current scientific literature in public health that links ecosystems and human health in Latin America; next, they describe and compare the two prevailing trends that form the basis for the theoretical and methodological debates on ecosystem approaches; they also review the empirical research in Latin America or concerning Latin American countries in which an ecosystem approach has been adopted. The results point to limited scientific output on the interface between ecosystems and human health; aspects involving public participation and implementation of institutional changes and public policies are still in a rather incipient stage.

Ecology↗

Predicting uncertainty in the ecotoxicological assessment of solid waste leachates.

Environmental managers need suitable technological methods to use in optimization studies to improve management of hazardous waste. One of the challenges to achieving a reliable hazardous waste classification is the improvement of procedures used forthe ecotoxicological characterization of solid waste leachates. Indeed, this step requires data that meet levels of acceptable quality if scientifically based decisions are to be made. In this study, we illustrate how the variability associated with the successive steps of a procedure used to assess ecotoxicological hazard of solid waste (i.e., primary sampling, laboratory sampling, toxicity measurements) can contribute to the overall variability of the ecotoxicity results. To this end, a municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash and a slag from a second smelting of lead were studied using a nested experimental design. The results showed that the waste sampling design is of major importance for limiting the final variability of toxicity test parameters. At the opposite, increasing the number of replicates at the toxicity test level has negligible impact on this variability. Our approach could be of great practical interest in ecotoxicological studies not only for ensuring a safe classification for these materials, but also for improving sampling protocols and facilitating less time-consuming and less expensive ecotoxicological evaluations.

Ecology↗