PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15364885

Evaluation of quality-control criteria for microarray gene expression analysis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Development of quality-control criteria to ensure reproducibility of microarray results for potential clinical application is still in its infancy. METHODS: In the present studies we developed quality-control criteria and evaluated their effect in microarray data analysis using total RNA from cell lines, frozen tumors, and a commercially available reference RNA. Quality-control criteria such as A(260)/A(280) ratios, percentage of rRNA, and median size of cDNA and cRNA synthesis products were evaluated for robustness in microarray analysis. Furthermore, precision studies using a reference material were performed on the Affymetrix HG-U133A high-density oligonucleotide microarrays. The same reference RNA sample was examined in 16 different chips run on 2 different days in the four different modules of the Affymetrix fluidics workstation. Fresh and frozen fragmented cRNAs were also compared. An ANOVA model was fit to identify the main sources of variation. RESULTS: Good-quality samples showed >30% rRNA in the electropherograms and cDNA and cRNA synthesis products with median sizes of 2.0 and 3.0 kb, respectively. Precision studies showed that the main source of variation was the day-to-day variability, minimally affecting hybridization exogenous control genes. Altogether, the results showed that the Affymetrix Genechip system is highly reproducible when RNA that meet the quality-control criteria are used (overall P >0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the need to establish defined quality-control criteria for sample quality to distinguish between analytical and biological variability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Catherine I Dumur, Suhail Nasim, Al M Best, Kellie J Archer, Amy C Ladd, Valeria R Mas, David S Wilkinson, Carleton T Garrett, Andrea Ferreira-Gonzalez. 2004-09-13. Evaluation of quality-control criteria for microarray gene expression analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2004.033225

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗