PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15370996

Automatic construction of gene relation networks using text mining and gene expression data.

Abstract

Microarray gene expression analysis is a powerful high-throughput technique that enables researchers to monitor the expression of thousands of genes simultaneously. Using this methodology huge amounts of data are produced which have to be analysed. Clustering algorithms are used to group genes together based on a predefined distance measure. However, clustering algorithms do not necessarily group the genes in a biological meaningful way. Additional information is needed to improve the identification of disease relevant genes. The primary objective of our project is to support the analysis of microarray gene expression data by construction of gene relation networks (GRNs). Required information can not be found in a structured representation like a database. In contrast, a large number of relations are described in biomedical literature. The main outcome of this project is the implementation of a software system that provides clinicians and researchers with a tool that supports the analysis of microarray gene expression data by mapping known relationships from the biomedical literature to local gene expression experiments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thomas Karopka, Thomas Scheel, Sven Bansemer, Anne Glass. 2004. Automatic construction of gene relation networks using text mining and gene expression data.. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230412331280422

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Writing good abstracts.

INTRODUCTION: Writing an abstract means to extract and summarize (AB - absolutely, STR - straightforward, ACT - actual data presentation and interpretation). Thousands of abstracts are submitted to stroke conferences each year. The following suggestions may improve the chances of your work being selected for presentation, and to communicate results in the most efficient and unambiguous way. TITLE AND STRUCTURE: Make the title dynamic and informative, rather than descriptive. Structure the abstract following the IMRaD (Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion) principle for your future original paper where background would become Introduction and conclusions would enter Discussion. Select the appropriate category for submission carefully. This determines which experts grade the abstract and the session where your competitors represent their work. If selected appropriately, your abstract is more likely to be graded by peers with similar interests and familiarity with your work or field. Methods should describe the study design and tools of data acquisition shortly, not data. RESULTS: Provide data that answer the research question. Describe most important data with numbers and statistics. Make your point with data, not speculations and opinions. Abbreviations should be avoided and only be used after they have been spelled out or defined. Common mistakes include failure to state the hypothesis, rationale for the study, sample size and conclusions. Highlight the novelty of your work by carefully chosen straightforward wording. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions have to be based on the present study findings. Make sure your abstract is clear, concise and follows all rules. Show your draft to colleagues for critique, and if you are not a native English speaker show it to a person who can improve/correct your text. Remember that accepted abstracts of completed original research should be followed by published original papers - if this is not intended or fails, it may indicate an impaired ability to succeed in scientific writing and an academic career.

Abbreviations as Topic↗

Another ERICA trial?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Abbreviations as Topic↗