PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15377100

Penalized likelihood fluence optimization with evolutionary components for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.

Alan H Baydush·Lawrence B Marks·Shiva K Das
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A novel iterative penalized likelihood algorithm with evolutionary components for the optimization of beamlet fluences for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presented. This algorithm is designed to be flexible in terms of the objective function and automatically escalates dose, as long as the objective function increases and all constraints are met. For this study, the objective function employed was the product of target equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and fraction of target tissue within set homogeneity constraints. The likelihood component of the algorithm iteratively attempts to minimize the mean squared error between a homogeneous dose prescription and the actual target dose distribution. The updated beamlet fluences are then adjusted via a quadratic penalty function that is based on the dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints of the organs at risk. The evolutionary components were included to prevent the algorithm from converging to a local maximum. The algorithm was applied to a prostate cancer dataset, with especially difficult DVH constraints on bladder, rectum, and femoral heads. Dose distributions were generated for manually selected sets of three-, four-, five-, and seven-field treatment plans. Additionally, a global search was performed to find the optimal orientations for an axial three-beam plan. The results from this optimal orientation set were compared to results for manually selected orientation (gantry angle) sets of 3- (0 degrees, 90 degrees, 270 degrees), 4- (0 degrees, 90 degrees, 180 degrees, 270 degrees), 5- (0 degrees, 50 degrees, 130 degrees, 230 degrees, 310 degrees), and 7- (0 degrees, 40 degrees, 90 degrees, 140 degrees, 230 degrees, 270 degrees, 320 degrees) field axial treatment plans. For all the plans generated, all DVH constraints were met and average optimization computation time was approximately 30 seconds. For the manually selected orientations, the algorithm was successful in providing a relatively homogeneous target dose distribution, while simultaneously satisfying dose-volume limits by diverting dose away from proximal critical structures. The global search for an optimal three-beam orientation set yielded gantry angles of 70 degrees, 170 degrees, and 320 degrees. The EUD for this orientation set was 58 Gy, with 96% of the target within the set upper and lower limits. In comparison, optimized EUDs for the manually selected orientation sets of three, four, five and seven beams were 52.3, 52.6, 56.9, and 61.3 Gy, respectively. The orientation optimized three-beam plan yielded higher EUDs than the manually selected three-, four-, and five-beam plans, but lower EUDs than the seven-beam plan. In conclusion, a novel penalized likelihood algorithm with evolutionary components has successfully been implemented to optimize beamlet fluences for IMRT. Initial results are promising for dose conformity and uniformity of dose to target. When combined with optimal beam orientation selection for prostate cancer treatment planning, the results indicate that plans with a small number of optimized beam orientations achieve results comparable to those with a larger number of conventionally oriented beams.

Explore related subjects

Bone and BonesComputer SimulationHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRectumJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alan H Baydush, Lawrence B Marks, Shiva K Das. 2004. Penalized likelihood fluence optimization with evolutionary components for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1773631

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic findings in dedifferentiated liposarcoma with neural-like whorling pattern and metaplastic bone formation.

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma is a subtype of liposarcoma characterized by juxtaposition of well-differentiated liposarcoma with a nonadipocytic sarcoma. A peculiar form of dedifferentiated liposarcoma has been described, characterized by a nonlipogenic component with a neural-like whorling pattern of growth and metaplastic bone formation. We report the cytogenetic and molecular genetic findings of this peculiar form of dedifferentiation in a retroperitoneal tumor found in a 58-year-old female. The neoplasm had typical histologic findings and a complex karyotype characterized by several numeric and structural chromosomal abnormalities, including the presence of ring and giant rod chromosomes. Molecular cytogenetic studies found high levels of amplification of the MDM2 oncogene, consistent with the amplification of the 12q14 chromosome band, a cytogenetic abnormality commonly found in these tumors. These findings indicate that, despite its unique and peculiar morphologic features, this unusual type of dedifferentiated liposarcoma shares many of the cytogenetic features and molecular genetic abnormalities found in other forms of dedifferentiation. The specific cytogenetics and molecular determinants of these peculiar morphologic findings, however, remain unknown.

Bone and Bones↗
PubMed2007

Traditional and virtual microscopy compared experimentally in a classroom setting.

The technology known as virtual microscopy is now widely available to medical students. A number of medical school histology and pathology course directors, including those at the Eastern Virginia Medical School, are exploring the question of how best to make use of this new tool. The current study compared the efficacy of teaching and testing one unit of histology, bone and cartilage, using two technologies, namely, virtual microscopy and traditional microscopy. Additionally, the study examined whether low, moderate, high moderate, or high achieving students perform more effectively in any of the learning/testing formats. In a completely randomized block design, 96 first semester, first-year medical students were grouped by previous exam quartiles then subsequently randomly assigned to one of four groups. Using identical laboratory exercises with highly comparable slides for each experimental group, half of the subjects learned the exercise with traditional microscopy and half learned with virtual microscopy. Subjects were further randomly subdivided into virtual or actual testing groups. The authors found no significant differences in test scores when they examined effects by learning group or by testing group, nor were there significant interaction effects. Student performance evaluated by previous exam quartile was significant (P < 0.001). That is, students who had scored in a particular quartile on a previous test tended to score in the same quartile on the bone and cartilage test regardless of learning or testing method. In a short opinion survey, students were polled to evaluate their experience. Student preferences for both learning and testing method varied widely.

Bone and Bones↗