PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15387102

Collaborative iIslet Transplant Registry.

Abstract

The Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) was established in 2001 with support from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Diseases to collect and analyze information on islet transplants in North America. Thirteen of 27 invited islet transplant centers from the United States and Canada were already participants as of January 2004 with 5 additional centers awaiting IRB approval. In October 2003, CITR had preliminary data on 58 recipients of 107 islet transplants performed at the 13 member centers. These islet recipients averaged 41 years of age (SD 8.9), had diabetes for almost 28 years (SD 10.2) and were predominantly (67%) female. Islets were procured from 118 deceased donors whose average age was 42 (SD 12.2), weight was 90 kg (SD 23.5), and BMI was 30.5 (SD 7.9). The time from cross-clamp to pancreas recovery averaged 56 minutes (SD 134.6). An average of 7,127 islets (SD 2,973) were infused per kg of the recipient's weight. Outcome data are still pending as the Registry prepares its first annual report. Here we describe the organization, goals and design of the data collection instruments for CITR.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N C Close, B J Hering, R Anand, T L Eggerman, CITR Research Group. 2003. Collaborative iIslet Transplant Registry.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15387102/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗