PubMed · 15403466
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
BENMUSSA. 1949. Evolutionary chronic polyarthritis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15403466/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
How T-cells, attracted to local sites of inflammation in arthritides, affect heterotopic ossification is presently unknown. Here, we tested the hypothesis that T-cell cytokines play a role in the differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells (HMSC) into the osteoblast phenotype by inducing autologous BMP-2, providing a possible mechanism for heterotopic ossification. HMSC from multiple donor bones were treated with either activated T-cell conditioned medium (ACTTCM) or physiological concentrations of the major inflammatory cytokines, TNF-alpha, TGF-beta, IFN-gamma, and IL-17 (TTII), individually or in combinations. ACTTCM induced BMP-2 protein in a time-dependent manner over a 48 h period and alkaline phosphatase (AlkP) within 7 days. In combination, TTII, like ACTTCM, induced AlkP and synergistically induced BMP-2 protein. Either individually, or in combinations of up to three, the T-cell cytokines failed to induce BMP-2 above control levels while a combination of all four cytokines synergistically induced BMP-2 10-fold as assessed by ELISA. TTII induced mineralized matrix as effectively as dexamethasone. Inhibition of p38 MAPK completely inhibited TTII-induced BMP-2 production and matrix mineralization. Real time RT-PCR analysis demonstrated a striking early (within 4 h) increase in BMP-2 gene expression by TTII, which was suppressed by p38 MAP kinase inhibition. In localized chronic inflammatory diseases, T-cell cytokines released at localized sites of inflammation may be the driving force for differentiation of local mesenchymal stromal cells into the osteoblast phenotype thereby playing a significant role in the heterotopic ossification observed in these diseases.
PURPOSE: Little is known about the potential adverse effects of interventions to reduce dietary fat. We examined the physical and emotional health effects, and social consequences experienced by women at high risk for breast cancer who had participated in a low-fat diet intervention, randomized, controlled trial for at least 5 years. METHODS: Participants in the Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Trial from British Columbia were mailed a survey questionnaire that included the validated Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ), and a series of questions on health-related and social constructs. Responses were compared between the diet intervention and control groups by menopausal status. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 359 women in the diet intervention group and 382 in the control group. No significant differences were found between these groups for SF-36 and WHQ health outcomes, hair/nail changes, physical activity levels, family/friend support levels, and doctor visits. Significantly more women in the intervention group reported taking products for arthritis (other than pain medication), greater difficulty in maintaining eating habits in social situations and at work, greater stress, and guilt related to personal eating habits. These findings persisted for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. CONCLUSION: Changes resulting from a low-fat diet intervention can be incorporated into women's daily lives with limited long-term negative effects.
OBJECTIVE: To examine employed individuals' perceptions of arthritis-work spillover (AWS), the reciprocal influence of arthritis on work and work on arthritis, and the demographic, illness, and work context factors associated with AWS. METHODS: The study group comprised 492 employed individuals with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis. Participants completed an interview-administered, structured questionnaire assessing AWS, demographic (e.g., age, sex), illness (e.g., disease type, pain, activity limitations), and work context (e.g., workplace control, hours of work) variables. Principal components analysis, reliability analysis, and multiple linear regression were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: A single factor solution emerged for AWS. The scale had an internal reliability of 0.88. Respondents were more likely to report that work interfered with caring for their arthritis than they were to report that their disease affected their work performance. Younger respondents, those with more fatigue and workplace activity limitations, and those working in trades and transportation reported more AWS. Individuals with more control over their work schedules reported less AWS. CONCLUSION: The results of this study extend research on arthritis by reexamining the interface between arthritis and employment. This study introduces a new measure of AWS that enhances the range of tools available to researchers and clinicians examining the impact of arthritis in individuals' lives.