PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1541914

Second-order approximations for selection coefficients at polygenic loci. II. Pleiotropy.

Abstract

I determine the second-order approximation for the phenotypic distribution of an arbitrary number of quantitative traits, ignoring the effects of epistasis and linkage disequilibrium, conditioned on the presence of a specified genotype at one underlying locus of small effect. Using this approximation, I determine formulae for the effects of selection at a single locus with random mating under either Gaussian stabilizing selection, or correlated selection with truncation selection for one character. These formulae apply for arbitrary phenotypic distributions, yet even with multivariate Gaussian distributions of phenotypic effects the formula for correlated selection includes a correction to the standard formula in Falconer (1989). I demonstrate that this approximation has an error that is third order in the allelic or genotypic effects, independent of the form of the phenotypic distribution. I show also that the approximation of analogous form for the phenotypic distribution conditioned on the presence of a specified allele at a single locus is also correct to second order. Both approximations allow for dominance and are consistent in the sense that computing marginal fitnesses from approximations based on genotypic deviations and those based on average allelic effect yield the same answers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Hastings. 1992. Second-order approximations for selection coefficients at polygenic loci. II. Pleiotropy.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00173293

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of methods for analysis of selective genotyping survival data.

Survival traits and selective genotyping datasets are typically not normally distributed, thus common models used to identify QTL may not be statistically appropriate for their analysis. The objective of the present study was to compare models for identification of QTL associated with survival traits, in particular when combined with selective genotyping. Data were simulated to model the survival distribution of a population of chickens challenged with Marek disease virus. Cox proportional hazards (CPH), linear regression (LR), and Weibull models were compared for their appropriateness to analyze the data, ability to identify associations of marker alleles with survival, and estimation of effects when all individuals were genotyped (full genotyping) and when selective genotyping was used. Little difference in power was found between the CPH and the LR model for low censoring cases for both full and selective genotyping. The simulated data were not transformed to follow a Weibull distribution and, as a result, the Weibull model generally resulted in less power than the other two models and overestimated effects. Effect estimates from LR and CPH were unbiased when all individuals were genotyped, but overestimated when selective genotyping was used. Thus, LR is preferred for analyzing survival data when the amount of censoring is low because of ease of implementation and interpretation. Including phenotypic data of non-genotyped individuals in selective genotyping analysis increased power, but resulted in LR having an inflated false positive rate, and therefore the CPH model is preferred for this scenario, although transformation of the data may also make the Weibull model appropriate for this case. The results from the research presented herein are directly applicable to interval mapping analyses.

Genotype↗