PubMed · 15419423
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E BIOLCATI. 1950. [Technics for apicectomy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15419423/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Endodontic reoperation was required for 30 teeth with periapical lesions in 18 patients, using microsurgical instruments and a 6cm long and 3mm wide endoscope for magnification. Reoperation was successful in 14 patients after 1 year.
AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration in removing the smear layer and to assess irrigant extrusion ex vivo. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-five instrumented canals of extracted human canine teeth that had been resected apically by removing 3 mm of the root tip were divided into one control and four experimental groups of seven teeth each. The roots were fixed in a plastic case and surrounded with normal saline agar coloured with 1% acid red. No irrigation was performed in the control teeth. Each root canal in the experimental groups was irrigated with 9 mL of 14% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for 3 min, and then with 6 mL of 6% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 2 min. In the intracanal aspiration technique, the irrigant was delivered from the tip of an injection needle placed 12 mm from the apical root-end and an aspiration needle that was connected to a Root ZX apex locator placed 2 and 3 mm short of the apical root-end in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In the conventional method, the tip of an injection needle used for delivery of the irrigant and as an active electrode was placed 2 and 3 mm short of the apical root-end in groups 3 and 4, respectively, the tip of the aspiration needle was placed 12 mm from the apical root-end in these groups. The readings of the Root ZX during irrigation were recorded. The cleanliness of the canal was evaluated by scoring smear layer from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the canal. Extrusion of NaOCl was detected by measuring the discoloured area of the agar around the apical root-end. The data obtained were statistically analysed by one-way anova, the Kruskal-Wallis test and Friedman's test. RESULTS: In the SEM study, the canals in groups 1-3 were significantly cleaner than those in the control and group 4 (P < 0.05). The mean Root ZX readings in groups 1-3 were approximately "0.5". The discoloured area in group 3 was significantly larger than the other groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Irrigation using the intracanal aspiration technique allowed more effective removal of the smear layer than that performed by the conventional method in an apically resected canine tooth. The intracanal aspiration technique produced limited extrusion of the irrigant beyond the apical foramen.
Most endodontists use ultrasonic instruments for retrograde root-end cavity preparations even though they have been found to produce cracks. In this laboratory study, thirty-six randomly chosen roots had root-end cavity preparations made with the Waterlase laser and only one questionable intra-canal crack was found. It was concluded that the Waterlase laser when used to make endodontic root-end cavity preparations produces either no cracks, or a very low percentage (2.8%) of cracks.