PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1542473

Lessons to be learnt from a perinatal audit.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to analyse all perinatal deaths at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, in a two year period, in order to identify areas in which changes could be made to improve the outcome for future pregnancies. METHODS: an audit was performed of all perinatal deaths at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, in 1989 and 1990. All deaths were classified according to the primary obstetric factor which initiated the sequence of events leading to the death. The events surrounding each death were examined for the presence of avoidable factors. RESULTS: there were 293 deaths after 20 weeks gestation, which included 172 fetal deaths, 116 neonatal deaths and five infant deaths. Fetal abnormality (24%) was the commonest cause of death followed by spontaneous prematurity (19%) and infection (11%). Fifty-one percent of the multigravid women who suffered a perinatal loss of a normally formed fetus had had a poor obstetric history. Avoidable factors were detected in 25% of all deaths. CONCLUSIONS: this audit clearly identified the causes of perinatal loss where improvements can be made. Advances in medical knowledge, technology and/or expertise are required to improve the outcome for the common causes of perinatal loss--fetal abnormality, prematurity and infection. Further staff and patient education with application of current knowledge and close attention to accepted standards of care should improve the outcome for the growth retarded fetus and the asphyxiated fetus in labour.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M A Birdsall, N S Pattison. 1992-02-26. Lessons to be learnt from a perinatal audit.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1542473/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Complex adaptive systems: a response to Luchins.

Luchins (2003, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 31(2), 183-186) distinguishes the mutual strengths and shortcomings of qualitative and quantitative approaches as applied to the complexities of evaluation psychiatric hospital functioning in particular, and behavioral healthcare practice in general. This brief response offers an examination of the complex interplay of factors within non-linear models in a conceptualization of complex adaptive systems for understanding causal factors in mental health administration as well as calling into question the myth of the relationship between measurement and hence control and understanding and prediction.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

In search of a familial cancer risk assessment tool.

Approximately one in three individuals will be affected by cancer in their lifetime in the United States, and some are at elevated risk because of family history. Although assessment of family history of cancer and cancer risk is the standard of care, the current health-care system appears unable to meet this need. Because individuals are increasingly using the Internet, web-based cancer risk assessment tools (CRATs) may provide a way to meet this need. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the types of familial CRATs available on the Internet and their nature. The current review evaluated five CRATs identified through an Internet search based on (i) their ability to identify those at the highest risk of cancer (i.e. those with hereditary cancer syndromes), (ii) their strengths and limitations based on criteria adapted from Rich and colleagues (2004, 2005), (iii) their readability based on four readability calculations, and (iv) their quality based on criteria from Health on the Net. The general limitations of CRATs as a whole were also delineated, including concerns about availability to those who are poor and underserved and those who have lower levels of literacy. Recommendations for future tools include assessing risk for a greater number of diseases, using theoretically driven approaches to increase the likelihood that individuals will engage in appropriate health behaviors, and making a greater effort to reach diverse populations.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research.

The overall aim of this study was to contribute to the development of metasynthesis through an analysis of the challenges involved. The study grew out of the critique of qualitative metaresearch raised by current developers of metamethodologies. Different views on the application of methodologies have emerged in the literature, contributing to confusion and ambiguity concerning the challenging questions of what, why, how, and who in metasynthesis research, which might increase the risk of misunderstanding. The roots of metasynthesis research are seen as multifaceted and influencing the development of the methods in different directions. The primary worth of metasynthesis is theoretical and/or methodological development (synthesis) combined with the potential for reflection: going beyond and behind the studies (meta). Metasynthesis research has also the potential to raise questions of research collaboration, culture, and language.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗