PubMed · 15430669
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1950. ELECTRON microscope.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15430669/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: In breast radiotherapy, delivery of manually-calculated electron boosts limits retrospective dose-response analyses as dose distribution is unavailable. This work evaluates the feasibility of reconstructing dose distributions from manually planned electron boosts in breast-conserving radiotherapy. METHODS: Only 72 out of 198 breast cancer patients had complete stored dose distributions from sequential electron boosts in the REQUITE study. Arbitrary data from 70/72 patients were used to develop and validate dose reconstruction method. Twenty patients were used to determine optimal parameters for Monte-Carlo-based (MC) electron dose reconstruction on RayStation (v.11B-R), considering CT-calibration curve, MC-history number, andcalculation grid resolution. Remaining 50 patients were used to quantify dose reconstruction accuracy. The similarity between reconstructed and stored dose was evaluated using 3D-gamma index and dosimetric parameters extracted from breast and tumour bed contours. Dose difference location was evaluated using dose-location histogram. RESULTS: Calculation grid resolution significantly impacted electron dose distribution (p < 0.01), where the finest grid (0.15 cm) showed highest similarity to stored doses. CT-calibration curve and MC-history number had a negligible influence on dose reconstruction. Dosimetric difference between reconstructed and stored doses was < 1 Gy for breast and tumour bed. Reconstructed dose was achieved > 90% gamma passing rate in the validation set. However, around 2.5 Gy dose differences were observed at the skin and tissue interface regions. CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective electron boost dose reconstruction is feasible with acceptable accuracy, and could increase data completeness in large cohort studies. Caution is advised when assessing dose near tissue interface and further validation is needed outside the REQUITE dataset.
Electron capture dissociation (ECD) represents a significant advance in tandem mass spectrometry for the identification and characterization of post-translational modifications (PTMs) of polypeptides. In comparison with the conventional fragmentation techniques, such as collisionally induced dissociation and infrared multi-photon dissociation, ECD provides more extensive sequence fragments, while allowing the labile modifications to remain intact during backbone fragmentation. This unique attribute offers ECD as an attractive alternative for detection and localization of PTMs. The success and rapid adoption of ECD recently led to the culmination of The 1st International Uppsala Symposium on Electron Capture Dissociation of Biomolecules and Related Phenomena (October 19-22, 2003, Stockholm, Sweden). Herein, we present a general overview of the ECD technique as well as selected applications in characterization of post-translationally modified polypeptides.
The pulse radiolysis of aqueous NO has been reinvestigated, the variances with the prior studies are discussed, and a mechanistic revision is suggested. Both the hydrated electron and the hydrogen atom reduce NO to yield the ground-state triplet (3)NO(-) and singlet (1)HNO, respectively, which further react with NO to produce the N(2)O(2)(-) radical, albeit with the very different specific rates, k((3)NO(-) + NO) = (3.0 +/- 0.8) x 10(9) and k((1)HNO + NO) = (5.8 +/- 0.2) x 10(6) M(-)(1) s(-)(1). These reactions occur much more rapidly than the spin-forbidden acid-base equilibration of (3)NO(-) and (1)HNO under all experimentally accessible conditions. As a result, (3)NO(-) and (1)HNO give rise to two reaction pathways that are well separated in time but lead to the same intermediates and products. The N(2)O(2)(-) radical extremely rapidly acquires another NO, k(N(2)O(2)(-) + NO) = (5.4 +/- 1.4) x 10(9) M(-)(1) s(-)(1), producing the closed-shell N(3)O(3)(-) anion, which unimolecularly decays to the final N(2)O + NO(2)(-) products with a rate constant of approximately 300 s(-)(1). Contrary to the previous belief, N(2)O(2)(-) is stable with respect to NO elimination, and so is N(3)O(3)(-). The optical spectra of all intermediates have also been reevaluated. The only intermediate whose spectrum can be cleanly observed in the pulse radiolysis experiments is the N(3)O(3)(-) anion (lambda(max) = 380 nm, epsilon(max) = 3.76 x 10(3) M(-)(1) cm(-)(1)). The spectra previously assigned to the NO(-) anion and to the N(2)O(2)(-) radical are due, in fact, to a mixture of species (mainly N(2)O(2)(-) and N(3)O(3)(-)) and to the N(3)O(3)(-) anion, respectively. Spectral and kinetic evidence suggests that the same reactions occur when (3)NO(-) and (1)HNO are generated by photolysis of the monoprotonated anion of Angeli's salt, HN(2)O(3)(-), in NO-containing solutions.