PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15444584

Eletromyography.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W GAEDKE. 1954. Eletromyography.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15444584/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Activation impairment alters muscle torque-velocity in the knee extensors of persons with post-stroke hemiparesis.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate mechanisms of impaired force production in post-stroke hemiparesis. METHODS: Knee extensor torque-velocity and activation-velocity relationships were examined in seventeen persons with post-stroke hemiparesis (age 57.5, +/-6.9) and thirteen non-disabled (age 63.0 +/-10.4) persons. RESULTS: Velocity-dependent concentric torque impairment was exaggerated in subjects with hemiparesis relative to control subjects (p<.001). Muscle power was also less in the group with hemiparesis (p<.001), and plateaued at velocities > or =90deg/s (p>.05). In the control group agonist EMG during concentric actions exhibited a positive linear relationship as velocity increased (R(2)=.93, p<.05). The group with hemiparesis produced 34-60% less agonist EMG than controls (p<.02) and modulation was absent (p>.05). Antagonist EMG was either greater in the control (biceps femoris, p<.006) or similar between groups (semimembranosus, p=.95). Under eccentric testing conditions, torque normalized to peak isometric torque (p=.44) and rectus femoris activation (p=.33) were similar between groups, indicating a relative preservation of eccentric torque producing capacity post-stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Certain clinical perspectives assert that weakness following central nervous system injury stems from spastic antagonist restraint. Instead, absence of an antagonist restraint strongly suggests that impaired agonist activation is the principal determinant of hemiparetic weakness. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings have important implications for promoting optimal recovery of motor function in neuro-rehabilitation.

Electromyography↗

Muscle activation profiles about the knee during Tai-Chi stepping movement compared to the normal gait step.

The purpose of this study was to investigate knee muscle activity patterns in experienced Tai-Chi (TC) practitioners during normal walking and TC stepping. The electromyographic (EMG) activity of vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), bicep femoris (BF), and gastrocnemius (GS) muscles of 11 subjects (five females and six males) during the stance phase of normal walking was compared to stance phase of a TC step. Knee joint motion was also monitored by using an Optotrak motion analysis system. Raw EMG was processed by root-mean-square (RMS) technique using a time constant of 50 ms, and normalized to maximum of voluntary contraction for each muscle, referred to as normalized RMS (nRMS). Peak nRMS and co-contraction (quantified by co-contraction index) during stance phase of a gait cycle and a TC step were calculated. Paired t-tests were used to compare the difference for each muscle group peak and co-contraction pair between the tasks. The results showed that only peak values of nRMS in quadriceps and co-contraction were significantly greater in TC stepping compared to normal walking (Peak values of nRMS for VL were 26.93% for normal walking and 52.14% for TC step, p=0.001; VM are 29.12% for normal walking and 51.93% for TC stepping, p=0.028). Mean co-contraction index for VL-BF muscle pairs was 13.24+/-11.02% during TC stepping and 9.47+/-7.77% in stance phase of normal walking (p=0.023). There was no significant difference in peak values of nRMS in the other two muscles during TC stepping compared to normal walking. Preliminary EMG profiles in this study demonstrated that experienced TC practitioners used relatively higher levels of knee muscle activation patterns with greater co-contraction during TC exercise compared to normal walking.

Electromyography↗