PubMed · 15445336
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E KRUEGER. 1960-11-18. [Practical colposcopy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15445336/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: The 2001 Bethesda System category of atypical squamous cells (ASC) denotes changes suggestive, but inconclusive for, a squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL). ASC is subcategorized as: 1) "undetermined significance (ASC-US)," when changes suggest low-grade or indeterminate-grade SIL and 2) "cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H)," when a cancer precursor is suspected. METHODS: To better define the characteristics of ASC-H, the authors analyzed and compared human papillomavirus (HPV) testing data and outcomes after 2 years for participants in the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance Low-Grade SIL Triage Study (ALTS), a randomized trial of 5060 women. RESULTS: Among women with thin-layer cytology findings of ASC-H, 84% tested positive for HPV, 50% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 41%-60%) were diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) type 2+, and 30% (95% CI, 22-39%) were diagnosed with CIN3+. Positive HPV tests and diagnoses of CIN2+ and CIN3+ were found to be more common among women with ASCH compared with those with ASC-US, but the highest frequencies were found to be associated with high-grade SIL. For women age < 35 years with ASC-H, HPV detection exceeded 85%, whereas only 4 of 10 women (40%) age >/=35 years tested positive for HPV (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: A finding of ASC-H seems to confer a substantially higher risk for CIN2+ and CIN3+ than ASC-US. Immediate colposcopy may be the appropriate management for young women with ASC-H, but the utility of HPV testing for managing older women with ASC-H requires additional study.
OBJECTIVE: In a previous clinical follow-up study on psychosocial factors and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), we had noticed a high percentage of early interventions to the cervix by gynaecologists, in discordance with the research protocol. The aim of the current study was to investigate the reasons for these interventions. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively analysed the study records of the clinical study, concerning the follow-up of 98 patients with a CIN 1 or 2 lesion for 2.25 years by colposcopy and cervical smears. We recorded the number of early interventions that had occurred in the clinical study as well as the reasons for these interventions. A distinction was made between acceptable and unacceptable reasons for early intervention. RESULTS: During follow-up, 39 out of 98 women (40%) had undergone intervention in discordance with the protocol. No acceptable reason for these interventions was found for 67% of these patients (26/39). In the majority of these cases either no reason for the intervention had been given, or the gynaecologist had feared for progression of the CIN lesion. CONCLUSION: Gynaecologists tend to intervene during follow-up of CIN, partly out of fear for progression. This tendency may complicate follow-up studies on CIN.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.