PubMed · 15448247
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
David Grimm. 2004-09-24. 2004 Visualization Challenge. Illustration.. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.305.5692.1905
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The origin of the barrier for proton transport through the aquaporin channel is a problem of general interest. It is becoming increasingly clear that this barrier is not attributable to the orientation of the water molecules across the channel but rather to the electrostatic penalty for moving the proton charge to the center of the channel. However, the reason for the high electrostatic barrier is still rather controversial. It has been argued by some workers that the barrier is due to the so-called NPA motif and/or to the helix macrodipole or to other specific elements. However, our works indicated that the main reason for the high barrier is the loss of the generalized solvation upon moving the proton charge from the bulk to the center of the channel and that this does not reflect a specific repulsive electrostatic interaction but the absence of sufficient electrostatic stabilization. At this stage it seems that the elucidation and clarification of the origin of the electrostatic barrier can serve as an instructive test case for electrostatic models. Thus, we reexamine the free-energy surface for proton transport in aquaporins using the microscopic free-energy perturbation/umbrella sampling (FEP/US) and the empirical valence bond/umbrella sampling (EVB/US) methods as well as the semimacroscopic protein dipole Langevin dipole model in its linear response approximation version (the PDLD/S-LRA). These extensive studies help to clarify the nature of the barrier and to establish the "reduced solvation effect" as the primary source of this barrier. That is, it is found that the barrier is associated with the loss of the generalized solvation energy (which includes of course all electrostatic effects) upon moving the proton charge from the bulk solvent to the center of the channel. It is also demonstrated that the residues in the NPA region and the helix dipole cannot be considered as the main reasons for the electrostatic barrier. Furthermore, our microscopic and semimacroscopic studies clarify the problems with incomplete alternative calculations, illustrating that the effects of various electrostatic elements are drastically overestimated by macroscopic calculations that use a low dielectric constant and do not consider the protein reorganization. Similarly, it is pointed out that microscopic potential of mean force calculations that do not evaluate the electrostatic barrier relative to the bulk water cannot be used to establish the origin of the electrostatic barrier. The relationship between the present study and calculations of pK(a)s in protein interiors is clarified, pointing out that approaches that are applied to study the aquaporin barrier should be validated by pK(a)s calculations. Such calculations also help to clarify the crucial role of solvation energies in establishing the barrier in aquaporins.
Extensive and kinetically well-defined water exchanges occur during germination of seeds. A putative role for aquaporins in this process was investigated in Arabidopsis. Macro-arrays carrying aquaporin gene-specific tags and antibodies raised against aquaporin subclasses revealed two distinct aquaporin expression programs between dry seeds and young seedlings. High expression levels of a restricted number of tonoplast intrinsic protein (TIP) isoforms (TIP3;1 and/or TIP3;2, and TIP5;1) together with a low expression of all 13 plasma membrane aquaporin (PIP) isoforms was observed in dry and germinating materials. In contrast, prevalent expression of aquaporins of the TIP1, TIP2 and PIP subgroups was induced during seedling establishment. Mercury (5 microM HgCl(2)), a general blocker of aquaporins in various organisms, reduced the speed of seed germination and induced a true delay in maternal seed coat (testa) rupture and radicle emergence, by 8-9 and 25-30 h, respectively. Most importantly, mercury did not alter seed lot homogeneity nor the seed germination developmental sequence, and its effects were largely reversed by addition of 2 mM dithiothreitol, suggesting that these effects were primarily due to oxidation of cell components, possibly aquaporins, without irreversible alteration of cell integrity. Measurements of water uptake in control and mercury-treated seeds suggested that aquaporin functions are not involved in early seed imbibition (phase I) but would rather be associated with a delayed initiation of phase III, i.e. water uptake accompanying expansion and growth of the embryo. A possible role for aquaporins in germinating seeds and more generally in plant tissue growth is discussed.
High-resolution structural data of membrane proteins can be obtained by studying 2D crystals by electron crystallography. Finding the right conditions to produce these crystals is one of the major bottlenecks encountered in 2D crystallography. Many reviews address 2D crystallization techniques in attempts to provide guidelines for crystallographers. Several techniques including new approaches to remove detergent like the biobeads technique and the development of dedicated devices have been described (dialysis and dilution machines). In addition, 2D crystallization at interfaces has been studied, the most prominent method being the 2D crystallization at the lipid monolayer. A new approach based on detergent complexation by cyclodextrins is presented in this paper. To prove the ability of cyclodextrins to remove detergent from ternary mixtures (lipid, detergent and protein) in order to get 2D crystals, this method has been tested with OmpF, a typical beta-barrel protein, and with SoPIP2;1, a typical alpha-helical protein. Experiments over different time ranges were performed to analyze the kinetic effects of detergent removal with cyclodextrins on the formation of 2D crystals. The quality of the produced crystals was assessed with negative stain electron microscopy, cryo-electron microscopy and diffraction. Both proteins yielded crystals comparable in quality to previous crystallization reports.