PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15458064

Generalized interactions using virtual tools within the spring framework: cutting.

Kevin Montgomery·Cynthia D Bruyns
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present schemes for real-time generalized mesh cutting. Starting with the a basic example, we describe the details of implementing cutting on single and multiple surface objects as well as hybrid and volumetric meshes using virtual tools with single and multiple cutting surfaces. These methods have been implemented in a robust surgical simulation environment allowing us to model procedures ranging from animal dissection to cleft lip correction.

Explore related subjects

Biomechanical PhenomenaComputer GraphicsComputer SimulationComputer-Assisted InstructionDissectionEquipment DesignFeedbackGeneral SurgeryHumansModels, AnatomicSurgery, Computer-AssistedSurgical InstrumentsTouchUser-Computer InterfaceJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kevin Montgomery, Cynthia D Bruyns. 2002. Generalized interactions using virtual tools within the spring framework: cutting.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15458064/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2005

Diffusivity of solutes measured in glass capillaries using Taylor's analysis of dispersion and a commercial CE instrument.

We present a strategy for the rapid, efficient, and accurate measurement of the coefficient of diffusion (D) of solutes using a commercial capillary electrophoresis (CE) instrument. This approach utilizes the classic analysis of Taylor of the dispersion of solutes pumped hydrostatically through glass capillaries. To obtain accurate values of D, we modified Taylor's analysis of dispersion to account for the finite time required to reach steady-state flow in the capillary when using a CE instrument. Neglecting this effect results in measured diffusivities of phenylalanine, a model solute, that are in error by as much as 60% when compared with published values. We provide an analysis of this effect and a simple strategy for avoiding these errors. Using this approach, we analyze profiles of concentration fronts and measured values of D for phenylalanine to within 5% of published values. We also analyze profiles of pulses of solute. To determine values of D accurately, measurements of dispersion first need to be made as a function of injection volume to correct for the finite width of the injection plug, before they are corrected for unsteady-state flow. This approach also yields values of D for phenylalanine to within 5% of published values. In contrast to other techniques used for the determination of D, this approach requires no fluorescent labeling and is applicable to solutes of any molecular weight.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2005

Surface modification method of microchannels for gas-liquid two-phase flow in microchips.

A capillarity restricted modification method for microchannel surfaces was developed for gas--liquid microchemical operations in microchips. In this method, a microstructure combining shallow and deep microchannels and the principle of capillarity were utilized for chemical modification of a restricted area of a microchannel. A hydrophobic--hydrophilic patterning in microchannels was prepared as an example for guiding gas and liquid flows along the respective microchannels. Validity of the patterning was confirmed by measuring aqueous flow leak pressure from the hydrophilic microchannel to the hydrophobic one. The leak pressure of 7.7-1.1 kPa agreed well with that predicted theoretically from the Young-Laplace equation for the microchannel depth of 8.6-39 microm. In an experiment to demonstrate usefulness and effectiveness of the method, an air bubble was first introduced into the hydrophilic microchannel and purged from the hydrophobic-hydrophilic patterned microchannels. Next, the patterning structure was applied to remove dissolved oxygen by contacting the aqueous flow with a nitrogen flow. The concentration of dissolved oxygen decreased with contact time, and its time course agreed well with numerical simulation. These demonstrations showed that the proposed patterning method can be used in general microfluidic gas-liquid operations.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2005

Biomechanical comparison of anterior versus posterior lumbar threaded interbody fusion cages.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical flexibility tests were performed in specimens receiving anterior lumbar interbody fixation or posterior lumbar interbody fixation using dual threaded cages. OBJECTIVES: To determine differences in stability between anterior lumbar interbody fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fixation immediately after surgery and after fatigue. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No direct biomechanical comparison of lumbar fixation with threaded anterior lumbar interbody fixation or posterior lumbar interbody fixation cages has been performed previously. METHODS.: Sixteen anterior lumbar interbody fixation specimens and 16 posterior lumbar interbody fixation specimens underwent nondestructive biomechanical testing. Flexibility was assessed during applied flexion, extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and anteroposterior shear before and after fixation and fatigue. After testing, specimens were dissected, and the quality of fixation was graded. RESULTS: Variability in angular range of motion after fixation was greater than normal interspecimen variability by 89% after anterior lumbar interbody fixation and by 117% after posterior lumbar interbody fixation. During flexion-extension and lateral bending, posterior lumbar interbody fixation allowed a mean of 60% smaller neutral zones than anterior lumbar interbody fixation (P < 0.05, nonpaired Student t test). During axial rotation, anterior lumbar interbody fixation allowed 15% less range of motion than posterior lumbar interbody fixation unless facets were kept intact with posterior lumbar interbody fixation (6 of 16 specimens), in which case anterior lumbar interbody fixation allowed 41% greater range of motion than posterior lumbar interbody fixation. During anteroposterior shear, both anterior lumbar interbody fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fixation restrained range of motion to within 50% of normal. Anterior lumbar interbody fixation loosened, on average, 130% more with fatigue than posterior lumbar interbody fixation during anteroposterior shear. CONCLUSIONS: Both anterior lumbar interbody fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fixation provided inconsistent stability. Therefore, stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fixation or posterior lumbar interbody fixation may often be ineffective clinically. During all modes of loading except axial rotation, posterior lumbar interbody fixation performed slightly better than anterior lumbar interbody fixation, perhaps due to deeper hole preparation and destruction of anterior stabilizers necessary for anterior lumbar interbody fixation. Avoiding resection of facets during posterior lumbar interbody fixation led to significantly better performance during axial rotation.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗