PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15461297

CT in your clinical practice.

Abstract

This report presents the results of a survey of 500 U.S.-based radiologists on critical issues associated with the use of CT. The survey represents a collaboration between the American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) and Philips Medical Systems. An outside firm, ICR/International Communications Research, conducted the survey. Survey questions were designed to elicit opinions about the past, present and future of CT, especially MDCT imaging, in various practice environments. Most radiologists (69%) indicated that CT has had a major influence on their specialty, more than any other medical advance, and that they expected this influence to increase. The idea that MDCT radically improves diagnostic quality was not universal, and opinions were mixed about the expansion of CT into new applications such as cardiac imaging. A number of concerns were attributed to the advent of MDCT and expansion in the number of slices-a phenomenon commonly referred to as a "slice war." These concerns revolved around managing the data explosion, excessive patient irradiation, bottlenecks in patient throughput, the ability of CT staffs to keep up with the rapidly evolving technology and the costs of keeping up with these changes. Nevertheless, most radiologists (78%) who were surveyed indicated that they used MDCT and that MDCT has had a positive effect on their practices in the past five years (90%); most (77%) expected that the number of slices would increase by two to 10 times the current level. Fifty-six percent said that they would be adding one to two scanners to their practices in the next five years.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gregory J Kohs, Joel Legunn. 2004. CT in your clinical practice.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15461297/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗