PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15468268

Tissue engineering: key elements and some trends.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Manuela E Gomes, Rui L Reis. 2004-08-09. Tissue engineering: key elements and some trends.. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200400094

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Development of a 3D cell culture system for investigating cell interactions with electrospun fibers.

There are many variables to be considered in studying how cells interact with 3D scaffolds used in tissue engineering. In this study we investigated the influence of the fiber diameter and interfiber spaces of 3D electrospun fiber scaffolds on the behavior of human dermal fibroblasts. Fibers of two dissimilar model materials, polystyrene and poly-L-lactic acid, with a broad range of diameters were constructed in a specifically developed 3D cell culture system. When fibroblasts were introduced to freestanding fibers, and encouraged to "walk the plank," a minimum fiber diameter of 10 microm was observed for cell adhesion and migration, irrespective of fiber material chemistry. A distance between fibers of up to 200 microm was also observed to be the maximum gap that could be bridged by cell aggregates--a behavior not seen in conventional 2D culture. This approach has identified some basic micro-architectural parameters for electrospun scaffold design and some key differences in fibroblast growth in 3D. We suggest the findings will be of value for optimizing the integration of cells in these scaffolds for skin tissue engineering.

Biocompatible Materials↗

Improved catalytic properties of immobilized lipases by the presence of very low concentrations of detergents in the reaction medium.

The addition of a very small concentration of a detergent (in many instances under the critical micellar concentration (cmc)) has been found to greatly increase the activity of immobilized lipases, using those from Pseudomonas fluorescens (PFL) and Candida antarctica (isoform B) as model enzymes. However, the detergents may also have a negative effect on enzyme activity; in fact, for all enzyme preparations and substrates the activity/detergent concentration curve reached a maximum value and started to decrease, in many instances even under the initial value. The concentration and nature of the detergent (SDS, CTAB, Triton X-100, or X-45) that permitted the maximum hyperactivation was different depending on the substrate. The best hyperactivation values promoted by the presence of detergent were over a 20-fold factor. The presence of detergents permitted the inhibition of lipases by irreversible covalent inhibitors (e.g., 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride) (AEBSF) while the enzyme, in the absence of detergent, is not inhibited by these irreversible inhibitors. This suggested that the main effect of the detergents is to shift the conformational equilibrium of lipases toward the open form. Moreover, the presence of detergents also permitted to improve the enantioselectivity exhibited by the immobilized lipases in some cases. For example, the enantioselectivity of PFL-glyoxyl agarose increased from 40 to more than 100 in the hydrolysis of (+/-)-2-hydroxy-4-phenylbutyric acid ethyl ester by using 0.1% CTAB.

Biocompatible Materials↗

Large scale dielectrophoretic construction of biofilms using textile technology.

Arrays of microelectrodes for AC electrokinetic experiments were fabricated by weaving together stainless steel wires (weft) and flexible polyester yarn (warp) in a plain weave pattern. The cloth produced can be used to collect cells in low conductivity media by dielectrophoresis (DEP). The construction of model biofilms consisting of a yeast layer on top of a layer of M. luteus is demonstrated, using polyethylenimine (PEI) as the flocculating agent. This technique offers an alternative to the formation of biofilms at microelectrodes made by photolithography, and would allow the construction of biofilms with defined internal architectures by DEP at much larger scales than was possible previously. Furthermore, the flexibility of the cloth would also allow it to be distorted or folded into various shapes.

Biocompatible Materials↗