PubMed · 15493318
Will the real discrepant learning disability please stand up?
Abstract
Willson and Reynolds (in this issue) challenged my thesis that the regression-based discrepancy method (RDM) is not a valid tool to detect aptitude-achievement discrepancies. In this response, I show that the statistical and theoretical counterarguments of Willson and Reynolds are based on a misreading of the statistical models presented. Furthermore, I demonstrate that the regression adjustment, which is largest for lower correlations, is the direct source of the lack of validity of the RDM procedure. Nevertheless, RDM can be considered a valid method to measure an achievement component that is unrelated to intelligence.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Wim Van den Broeck. Will the real discrepant learning disability please stand up?. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500303
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.