PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15502238

Genotyping technologies: application to biotransformation enzyme genetic polymorphism screening.

Marjorie Romkes·Shama C Buch
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics encompasses several major areas: the study of polymorphic variations in drug response and disease susceptibility, identification of the effects of drugs/xenobiotics at the genomic level, and genotype/phenotype associations. The most common type of human genetic variations is single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Several novel approaches to detection of SNPs are currently available. The range of new methods includes modifications of several conventional techniques, such as PCR, mass spectrometry (ms), and sequencing, as well as more innovative technologies such as fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and microarrays. The application of each of these techniques is largely dependent on the number of SNPs to be screened and sample size. The current chapter presents an overview of the general concepts of a variety of genotyping technologies, with an emphasis on the recently developed methodologies, including a comparison of the advantages, applicability, cost efficiency, and limitations of these methods.

Explore related subjects

BiotransformationEnzymesGenetic TechniquesGenetic TestingGenotypeHumansPharmacogeneticsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marjorie Romkes, Shama C Buch. 2005. Genotyping technologies: application to biotransformation enzyme genetic polymorphism screening.. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-840-4%3A399

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Divergent PXR function in seals: Endocrine adaptation or functional loss?

Seals accumulate xenobiotics through dietary biomagnification and exposure to polluted marine environments, with contaminants concentrating in their blubber. Biotransformation mitigates xenobiotic toxicity by converting lipophilic compounds into excretable hydrophilic metabolites, a process coordinated by nuclear receptors including the Pregnane X Receptor (PXR), whose plastic ligand-binding domain enables broad xenobiotic sensing. By examining PXR in pinnipeds, we investigated the evolutionary conservation and functional characterization of PXR using genomic sequence analysis, protein structural prediction, and transactivation assays, revealing broadly conserved structural features alongside species-specific functional divergence in receptor responsiveness to environmental stressors. Specifically, the obtained results highlight divergent gene and functional landscapes with ORF-disrupting mutations identified in Monachus monachus and Neomonachus schauinslandi that abolish receptor activation toward known PXR ligands. In contrast, Leptonychotes weddelli retained an intact PXR ORF but showed reduced receptor activity, revealing functional divergence in PXR among pinnipeds.

Biotransformation↗
PubMed2007

Biotransformation of raspberry ketone and zingerone by cultured cells of Phytolacca americana.

The biotransformation of raspberry ketone and zingerone were individually investigated using cultured cells of Phytolacca americana. In addition to (2S)-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanol (2%), (2S)-4-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-butanol (5%), 4-[4-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)phenyl]-2-butanone (19%), 4-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]phenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (23%), and (2S)-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)but-2-yl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (20%), two biotransformation products, i.e., 2-hydroxy-4-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]phenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (12%) and 2-hydroxy-5-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]phenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (11%), were isolated from suspension cells after incubation with raspberry ketone for three days. On the other hand, two compounds, i.e., (2S)-4-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)but-2-yl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (17%) and (2S)-2-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)-4-[4-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)-3-methoxyphenyl]butane (16%), together with (2S)-4-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-butanol (15%), 4-[4-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)-3-methoxyphenyl]-2-butanone (21%), and 4-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]-2-methoxyphenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (24%) were obtained upon addition of zingerone. Cultured cells of P. americana can reduce, and regioselectively hydroxylate and glucosylate, these food ingredients to their beta-glycosides.

Biotransformation↗
PubMed2007

Metabolism and bioactivation of 3-methylindole by human liver microsomes.

Metabolism and bioactivation of 3-methylindole (3MI) were investigated in human liver microsomes. The metabolism of two deuterium-labeled analogues of 3MI permitted a relatively unambiguous identification of multiple metabolites and glutathione (GSH) adducts of reactive intermediates. A total of eight oxidized metabolites were detected, five of which were assigned as previously identified 3-methyloxindole, 3-hydroxy-3-methylindolenine, 3-hydroxy-3-methyloxindole, 5-hydroxy-3-methylindole, and 6-hydroxy-3-methylindole. Among the three new metabolites, one was either 4- or 7-OH-3-methylindole, and the other two were derived from additional oxidation on the phenyl ring of 3-methyloxindole. When GSH was added to the microsomal incubations, seven conjugates that had molecular ions corresponding to the incorporation of GSH and an atom of oxygen at m/z 453 (group I) were produced, and two additional conjugates had molecular ions at m/z 437 that corresponded to the incorporation of GSH with no additional oxygen (group II). Two conjugates in group I (m/z 453) were apparently derived by GSH addition to the 5,6-epoxide metabolite of 3-methyloxindole. These two GSH adducts were tentatively identified as 5-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methyloxindole and 6-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methyloxindole. The most abundant conjugate in group I was identified as 3-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methyloxindole, which substantiated the presence of the putative 2,3-epoxy-3-methylindole intermediate. The remaining four adducts in group I were likely formed by conjugation of GSH at different positions of the phenyl ring, possibly via oxidation of 5-hydroxy-3-methylindole and 6-hydroxy-3-methylindole to two very interesting new electrophilic benzoquinone imine intermediates. For the group II conjugates (m/z 437), two isomers were identified as 2-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methylindole and 3-(glutathione-S-yl-methyl)-indole. The former adduct was primarily derived from the 2,3-epoxide intermediate by thiol conjugation followed by dehydration. The latter adduct was consistent with our previously published work on the dehydrogenation of 3MI. In those studies, we showed that the reactive intermediate, 3-methylenenindolenine, was formed by hydrogen abstraction at the methyl group and was trapped with GSH. The putative dehydrogenation bioactivation mechanism is also substantiated by the finding that CYP2E1 selectively generated 2-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methylindole but did not produce 3-(glutathione-S-yl-methyl)-indole. In summary, the results not only confirmed the formation of 2,3-epoxide-3-methylindole in human liver microsomes but also suggested that the phenolic metabolites of 3-methylindole were dehydrogenated to previously uncharacterized reactive intermediates.

Biotransformation↗