PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15515150

Assessing surrogates as trial endpoints using mixed models.

Edward L Korn·Paul S Albert·Lisa M McShane
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Having a surrogate for a definitive endpoint in a clinical trial can sometimes be useful when it is impractical, invasive or very time consuming to obtain the definitive endpoint. This paper discusses methods for assessing whether the surrogate-endpoint results of a trial can be used in place of definitive-endpoint results. It is important when examining this trial-level surrogacy to include the possibility of trial-level effects and to distinguish whether the treatment arms are naturally ordered, e.g. A vs A+B rather than A vs B. Methods using mixed models of trial-level summaries are discussed and compared to fixed-effects models and to the possibility of using models of individual-level data. We give estimators for definitive-endpoint results of a trial that are predicted from the surrogate-endpoint results of the trial and a set of results from previous trials in which both the definitive and surrogate trial results were available. Graphical displays are also suggested. Two sets of trial results previously analysed for trial-level surrogacy are used as examples.

Explore related subjects

Antineoplastic AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicModels, StatisticalOvarian NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Edward L Korn, Paul S Albert, Lisa M McShane. 2005-01-30. Assessing surrogates as trial endpoints using mixed models.. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1779

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2021

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Targeted therapy: for kids, too.

Innovative hypothesis-driven clinical trials have achieved major successes over the past several decades in treating children and adolescents with cancer. DNA-damaging cytotoxic agents have cured children with cancer. While the mission is not yet accomplished, chemotherapy has been validated. None of these drugs were designed specifically for a pediatric disease. Continued progress will require new strategies. Now being tested for adult cancers, these strategies include gene therapy, immunotherapy, cancer prevention, and signal transduction inhibitor (STI) therapy. Of these, the most promising is STI therapy, also known as molecular therapeutics or targeted therapy. For this therapy to succeed, components of signal transduction (i.e., candidate drug targets) must be identified, the targets relevant to cancers, and the drugs available for trial. Because STI therapy is biologically driven and because therapy will be tailored depending on the molecular profile of a specific patient's tumor, clinical pediatric oncologists will need to acquire greater understanding of signaling pathways and their therapeutic relevance. With examples drawn from pediatric oncology, the critical steps in the pre-clinical development of targeted therapy are reviewed here.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Novel indication for cancer therapy: Chk1 inhibition sensitizes tumor cells to antimitotics.

Paclitaxel (Taxol) is the most-prescribed anti-mitotic agent for a variety of advanced metastatic cancers. It induces mitotic arrest leading to apoptosis through microtubule stabilization. Chk1 is the major cell-cycle checkpoint kinase mediating S- and G2-arrests in response to various DNA-damages. Chk1 inhibitor is anticipated and has been demonstrated to potentiate the cytotoxicity of DNA-damaging agents through abrogation of cell-cycle checkpoints. Paclitaxel does not, however, induce Chk1 activation, and Chk1 has not been shown to function in mitotic checkpoint. Thus, Chk1 inhibitor is not expected to enhance the toxicity of paclitaxel. Here we show that downregulation of Chk1 sensitizes tumor cells to the toxicity of paclitaxel in cell proliferation assay. Fluorescence microscopy showed that Chk1 knockdown augments mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis in paclitaxel-treated cancer cells. Further, we elucidated the mechanism of this sensitization. Chk1 inhibition facilitates paclitaxel-induced M-phase entry by activation of Cdc2 kinase and accumulation of cyclin B1, the required cofactor for Cdc2 kinase activity. Moreover, Chk1 downregulation inhibits M phase exit through induction of the anaphase inhibitor, securin/PDS1. Collectively, Chk1 elimination sustains a more effective mitotic arrest as demonstrated by the more efficient accumulation of M-phase marker phospho-histone H3. We show that Chk1 elimination attenuates the paclitaxel-induced activation of the anti-apoptotic p42/p44 (ERK1/2) MAP kinase pathway, additionally contributing to the sensitization. Our results suggest that in addition to its well-established role as an enforcer of S and G2-checkpoints in response to genotoxic stress, Chk1 also plays a protective role in mitotic checkpoint to lessen mitotic catastrophe and thereby limits cell-death. Therefore Chk1 downregulation can not only potentiate DNA-damaging agents, but also enhance the toxicity of anti-microtubule agents, which significantly broadens its therapeutic applications.

Antineoplastic Agents↗