PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15527537

Using performance indicators to improve performance.

Abstract

The recent introduction of performance assessment within the UK NHS, incorporating numerous performance indicators (PIs) and league tables, has led to health care organisations facing large numbers of targets and a star rating system with associated rewards and penalties. However, there is considerable evidence that using PIs for judgement rather than learning provides perverse incentives and can prove counterproductive. Drawing on earlier PI systems which, supplemented by expert systems, were designed to promote learning and exploration particularly by encouraging analysis of interactions between different indicators, a series of 'mini case studies' is presented. These reveal interesting relationships and suggest explanations for variations in performance, areas worth exploring further and possible approaches to improving performance -- approaches not apparent from individual indicators and league tables. It is concluded that presentation of PIs in a format that encourages exploration and analysis could greatly enhance the potential of the current PIs to improve NHS performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Penelope M Mullen. 2004. Using performance indicators to improve performance.. https://doi.org/10.1258/0951484042317723

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Total hip arthroplasty wear simulation using the boundary element method.

In this paper an application of the boundary element method for simulating wear in total hip prosthesis is presented. Several examples including different update periods of the worn acetabular cup, various femoral head sizes and various materials for both the femoral head and the acetabular cup are simulated under the same variable loading conditions for up to 20 years of service. Moreover, two different femoral models are considered in order to investigate the influence of the femoral modelling. The analysis demonstrates that due to the boundary only modelling requirement, the computational time and storage remains low, allowing large service periods to be simulated. Generally, the results obtained are in good agreement with other researchers findings. Moreover, ignoring the bending of the femoral neck in the model, results in a small overestimation of the maximum wear depth, while the volumetric wear is slightly underestimated. However, these differences are trivial considering the reduction of the computational effort.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

[Health economic analysis of smoking cessation prior to surgery--based on a randomised trial].

Smoking is a risk factor for postoperative complications such as pneumonia, infections and impaired wound healing. These can be reduced by preoperative stop-smoking intervention six to eight weeks before surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the costs and benefits of a stop-smoking intervention program by means of cost consequence analysis (CCA). A total of 120 smokers scheduled for hip or knee alloplasty were randomised to either a control group or an intervention group. The intervention group received an intensive stop-smoking intervention six to eight weeks before surgery. The focus of the economic analysis was on direct costs. Diagnosis-related group (DRG) costs were used for estimating the costs of secondary surgery. In all, 64% of the patients in the intervention group stopped smoking before surgery, as opposed to 8% in the control group. In the intervention group, 5.4% of the patients had wound complications, and 3.6% needed secondary surgery. In the control group, 30.8% had wound complications and 15.4% needed secondary surgery. The direct costs were almost the same in the two groups, whereas the overall costs in the intervention group were lower than in the control group. The economic analysis shows that a preoperative smoking intervention program is beneficial to society and the patient alike. Based on these calculations, we recommend that all patients scheduled for hip or knee alloplasty be given preoperative stop-smoking intervention.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

CUSUM: a tool for early feedback about performance?

BACKGROUND: Modern day clinical practice demands evidence justifying our choice of treatment methods. Cumulative sum techniques (cusum) are amongst the simplest statistical methods known. They provide rapid analysis and identification of trends in a series of data. This study highlights use of these techniques as an early performance indicator of a clinical procedure before its implementation. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty received a simple dressing--blue gauze and Tegaderm. Cusum charting was used to assess the dressing with regards to skin blistering. At an acceptable level of performance the curve would oscillate about the horizontal axis and the overall trend therefore said to be flat. If performance is unacceptable, the cusum slopes upward. RESULTS: The cusum plot for the twenty patients did not cross the specified control limits. This showed that our simple dressing met specified standards with regards to wound blistering postoperatively. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of this simple, yet versatile cusum technique in the early evaluation of a clinical procedure before its implementation.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗