PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15532193

[Adherence and resistance].

Abstract

With the introduction of highly efficacious HAART therapy for HIV/AIDS successful long-term therapy became available. Nevertheless, it also revealed the fragile nature of antiretroviral therapy: resistant virus variants emerged, sometimes already after only short treatment episodes. And they soon began decreasing the newly gained armamentarium of specific inhibitors for HIV. A primary cause for failure could be found in a poor adherence to therapy or in the insufficient metabolic availability of a drug. It is primarily this fact that allows the HI-virus, although delayed, to complete its life cycle and to adapt to those incompletely controlling drug levels. And finally the conditioned virus will fail to respond to the respective drug. For the clinical therapy concept it can be fatal if a resistance development remains undetected. At this point the recently established diagnostic tool of resistance-determination is gaining importance: it allows detection and characterization of viral resistances early after emergence, helping to adapt and optimize HAART therapy. Two distinct methodologies have been developed: Genotyping and viral Phenotyping. Genotyping is technically less demanding and can principally be performed within one week. It is based on the identification of (known) resistance-associated mutations and on their combination onto one "virtual viral genome". This can be compared with known resistance-patterns and allows then the extrapolation of a viral resistance. The more demanding phenotyping method represents a direct determination, utilizing the concept of an "in vitro therapy": every drug to be assessed will be directly tested against virus information from the respective patient. As a consequence phenotyping has, particularly in its special format of a "replicative phenotyping", special utility for mixed virus populations or emerging minorities in the same patient, for viruses with new (unknown) mutations, and for viruses with reduced replicative capacity. Either method for the determination of HIV resistance reflects still a relatively young diagnostic tool. As a consequence current studies, underway in Switzerland and supported by the SHCS, aim at the further optimization of the tests and at an evaluation of their long term therapeutic benefit.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Klimkait, P Vernazza. 2004. [Adherence and resistance].. https://doi.org/10.1024/0040-5930.61.10.631

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Drug resistance mutations in HIV provirus are associated with defective proviral genomes with hypermutation.

BACKGROUND: HIV proviral sequencing overcomes the limit of plasma viral load requirement by detecting all the 'archived mutations', but the clinical relevance remains to be evaluated. METHODS: We included 25 participants with available proviral sequences (both intact and defective sequences available) and utilized the genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) to evaluate the level of resistance in their provirus and plasma virus. Defective sequences were further categorized as sequences with and without hypermutations. Personalized GSS score and total GSS score were calculated to evaluate the level of resistance to a whole panel of antiretroviral therapies and to certain antiretroviral therapy that a participant was using. The rate of sequences with drug resistance mutations (DRMs) within each sequence compartment (intact, defective and plasma viral sequences) was calculated for each participant. RESULTS: Defective proviral sequences harbored more DRMs than other sequence compartments, with a median DRM rate of 0.25 compared with intact sequences (0.0, P&#x200a;=&#x200a;0.014) and plasma sequences (0.095, P&#x200a;=&#x200a;0.30). Defective sequences with hypermutations were the major source of DRMs, with a median DRM rate of 1.0 compared with defective sequences without hypermutations (0.042, P&#x200a;<&#x200a;0.001). Certain Apolipoprotein B Editing Complex 3-related DRMs including reverse transcriptase gene mutations M184I, E138K, M230I, G190E and protease gene mutations M46I, D30N were enriched in hypermutated sequences but not in intact sequences or plasma sequences. All the hypermutated sequences had premature stop codons due to Apolipoprotein B Editing Complex 3. CONCLUSION: Proviral sequencing may overestimate DRMs as a result of hypermutations. Removing hypermutated sequences is essential in the interpretation of proviral drug resistance testing.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy: the current best way to reduce liver-related deaths in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients.

Approximately 25% to 35% of HIV-infected persons in developed countries are coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV liver disease is accelerated by HIV coinfection, especially at low CD4 cell counts. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) dramatically reduces HIV-related mortality, and liver disease has emerged as a major cause of death in HIV/HCV-coinfected persons. Anti-HCV therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin can cure HCV infection in up to 40% of coinfected patients; however, only approximately 10% of coinfected patients are considered candidates. Hence, HCV therapy cures approximately 4% of coinfected patients. Eleven cohort studies have shown that HAART is associated with a reduced rate of progression of HCV liver disease, and 4 of these studies have demonstrated a reduction in liver-related mortality. Although offering HCV therapy to the few eligible HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is important, early initiation of HAART in coinfected patients has a greater public health impact in reducing liver-related mortality than in curing HCV infection in approximately 4% of these patients.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Genotypic resistance of archived and circulating viral strains in the blood of treated HIV-infected individuals.

The aim of this study was to evaluate patterns of antiretroviral resistance of HIV-1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and in the plasma of patients whose therapeutic regimen is failing. Plasma and PBMC samples were collected from 95 HIV-infected patients undergoing long-term treatment. Genotyping of the reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease genes of HIV-1 was undertaken using the fluorescent dideoxy-terminator method. Comparison of the amino acid sequence of the RT and protease genes in cell-associated variants of HIV-1 with that of the plasma revealed that 62 of the 95 patients' samples tested exhibited different genotypic resistance patterns (discordant samples [DSs]). In 27% of samples, the patterns of resistance detected were concordant in both compartments. In 51% of DSs, the greatest number of mutations was found in plasma; however, in 37% of DSs, greater numbers of mutations were found in PBMC DNA. The HIV mutation patterns detected in plasma do not necessarily reflect those found in the cell-associated compartment. The observation that the cellular compartment may contain an archive of the resistance variant makes this reservoir an interesting substrate for analysis of the "resistance potential" in a given patient.

Anti-HIV Agents↗