PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15536539

Physical training and hormone replacement therapy reduce the decrease in bone mineral density in perimenopausal women: a pilot study.

Abstract

The effects of physical training and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on bone mineral density in perimenopausal women were studied. Sixty perimenopausal women were randomized to either physical training (n = 20), HRT (n = 20), or control group (n = 20). The study period was 18 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the femoral neck and lumbar spine was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA was performed before treatment and after 6 and 18 months. Blood samples for analysis of the bone markers U-deoxypyridinoline and osteocalcin were collected at the same time points. After 18 months, BMD in the spine had not decreased in either the training group or in the HRT group. In the control group, spine BMD had significantly decreased (p = 0.0014). U-Deoxypyridinoline and osteocalcin were increased significantly in the control group (p = 0.0198, p = 0.0295, respectively). No significant changes in bone marker levels were found in the training group or the HRT group. We found that both HRT and physical training can prevent loss of spine BMD in perimenopausal women over a period of 18 months. HRT remains a cornerstone in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms and preservation of BMD. However, HRT can only be used for limited periods of time due to the potential serious adverse effects. This study indicates a beneficial effect of physical activity on spine BMD in the perimenopausal period, and highlights its potential as an alternative to HRT during this period.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ingrid Bergström, Bo Freyschuss, Britt-Marie Landgren. 2004-11-05. Physical training and hormone replacement therapy reduce the decrease in bone mineral density in perimenopausal women: a pilot study.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1758-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A repeated measures concordance correlation coefficient.

The concordance correlation coefficient is commonly used to assess agreement between two raters or two methods of measuring a response when the data are measured on a continuous scale. However, the situation may arise in which repeated measurements are taken for each rater or method, e.g. longitudinal studies in clinical trials or bioassay data with subsamples. This paper proposes a coefficient for measuring agreement between two raters or two methods of measuring a response in the presence of repeated measurements. We illustrate the methodology with examples comparing (1) 1-hr versus 2-hr blood draws for measuring cortisol in an asthma clinical trial and (2) two measurements of percentage body fat, from skinfold calipers and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of a domain in the Runx2 transcription factor that interacts with the 1alpha,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3 receptor.

The Runx2 transcription factor is a key regulator of osteoblast differentiation. In response to 1alpha,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3, Runx2 may interact with the 1alpha,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3 receptor (VDR) in the promoter of target genes, producing a synergic activation of their transcription. Previous studies have suggested that the motifs responsible for the VDR-Runx2 interaction are contained within the 230-361 domain of Runx2. In this work, we confirmed by GST-pull down that Runx2(I(209-361)) is sufficient to interact with the VDR. To obtain structural information, GST-Runx2(I(209-361)) protein was overexpressed in Escherichia coli, purified and crystallized using the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method and polyethyleneglycol as a precipitant. The crystals were found to diffract to a maximum resolution of 2.7 A and a complete data set to a 3.3 A resolution was collected and analyzed. The crystals belong to the tetragonal system, with a space group P4 and unit-cell parameters of a = b = 90.8, and c = 57.2 A. The presence of a monomer of the recombinant GST-Runx2(I(209-361)) in the asymmetric unit gives a V(M) of 2.7 A(3) Da(-1) and a solvent content of 54.8%.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Quantifying the treatment effect explained by markers in the presence of measurement error.

Surrogate markers or intermediate markers are important in identifying subjects with high risk of a serious disease or for monitoring disease progression of a subject on treatment. Quantifying the proportion of treatment effect (PTE) explained by markers has been studied extensively. Due to reasons such as biological variation, limited machine precision, etc. markers are generally measured with error. The estimated PTE ignoring the measurement error could be biased, which may lead to incorrect conclusions. In this article, we adjust for the measurement error using regression calibration to construct a less biased estimator of excess relative odds, a quantity to measure the treatment effect explained by markers. The method is applied to data from a clinical study in osteoporosis.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗