PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15539368

Characteristics of attention and visual short-term memory: implications for visual interface design.

Abstract

Although the human retina can code many object images simultaneously, observers are often aware of only a tiny fraction of this information. These processing limitations of the visual brain have evolved to prioritize particularly relevant features of a scene while ignoring other irrelevant features. However, such selectivity has its drawbacks. In information-rich environments, such as driving a car or landing an aircraft, vision can fail to cope, and accidents can result. Accordingly, much recent research in psychophysics and ergonomics has examined how display characteristics affect our ability to process multiple features of the visual environment simultaneously. The majority of these experiments has found that performance can be optimized by combining several features into one visual 'object'. In contrast, several recent studies from my own laboratory have found the opposite pattern, indicating that information sources can often be more efficiently processed when they belong to separate objects. Indeed, these data suggest that the number of objects has no general effect on our perceptual performance. Instead, I argue for a two-pathway approach to understanding human visual capacities, and suggest that this approach may have important implications for a diverse range of display technologies, including cockpit displays.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Greg Davis. 2004-12-15. Characteristics of attention and visual short-term memory: implications for visual interface design.. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2004.1462

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗