PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15541660

Why a mechanical disc?

Abstract

Low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease is an overwhelming and growing problem in the United States and Western countries. Most degenerative disc disease can be treated nonoperatively. There are, however, substantial numbers of patients who have not benefited from exhaustive nonoperative treatments and subsequently seek surgical solutions to their incapacitating back pain. Lumbar fusion for back pain and/or leg pain associated with degenerative disc disease is considered the gold standard by which other treatments are judged. A challenge to spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease is now being offered in the form of the artificial disc. The implantation of an artificial lumbar disc allows for maintenance or restoration of physiologic movement at affected segments. A major long-term complication of spinal fusion is degeneration of a disc adjacent to the fused segments. Theoretically, the maintenance of motion could minimize development of adjacent disc degeneration as seen with spinal fusion. It is interesting to note that fusion of the hip or knee is not considered a primary procedure, but fusion is a primary procedure for the lumbar spine. Four artificial lumbar discs are discussed in this article. Early results are promising in terms of clinical results and movement, but long-term follow-up clinical trials must be done in order to gain an accurate comparison with spinal fusion. Trials are currently ongoing. The clinical results up to now and the potential for maintaining lumbar mobility throughout life warrant continuation of this surgical procedure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thomas J Errico. Why a mechanical disc?. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Influence of changes in the composition of an acrylic bone cement on its polymerization kinetics.

It has been suggested in the literature that a lower polymerization rate of an acrylic bone cement is favorable for the in vivo longevity of a cemented arthroplasty. The present work was a study of the influence of three changes in the composition of an acrylic bone cement (when taken separately) on the cement polymerization rate at 37 degrees C (assumed to be the temperature in the bone bed during a cemented arthroplasty) [k']. The changes were the amount of copolymer as a proportion of the total powder weight (in cements in which there is a copolymer in the powder), the amount of DMPT as a proportion of the total volume of the liquid monomer, and the accelerator. k' was calculated using values of the activation energy and the frequency factor (assuming the polymerization reaction is Arrhenius in nature) that were computed from measurements made using the nonisothermal mode of differential scanning calorimetry. Statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA, with Bonferroni correction, and factorial ANOVA) of the k' values showed that the change in accelerator had a significant influence on k'. The importance of this finding, together with results from two relevant literature reports, is discussed within the context of the use of modified bone cements in cemented arthroplasties.

Arthroplasty, Replacement↗

Glenohumeral kinematics following total shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element investigation.

The osseous geometry of the glenohumeral joint is naturally nonconforming and minimally constrained, and the joint's stability is maintained by action of the rotator cuff muscles. Damage to these muscles is often associated with joint degeneration, and a variety of glenoid prostheses have been developed to impart varying degrees of stability postoperatively. The issues of conformity and constraint within the artificial shoulder have been addressed through in vivo and in vitro studies, although few computational models have been presented. The current investigation presents the results of three-dimensional finite element analyses of the total shoulder joint and the effects of design parameters upon glenohumeral interaction. Conformity was shown not to influence the loads required to destabilize the joint, although it was the principal factor determining the magnitude of humeral head translation. Constraint was found to correlate linearly with the forces required to dislocate the humeral head, with higher constraint leading to slightly greater humeral migration at the point of joint instability. The model predicts that patients with a dysfunctional supraspinatus would experience frequent eccentric loading of the glenoid, especially in the superior direction, which would likely lead to increased fixation stresses, and hence, a greater chance of loosening. For candidates with an intact rotator cuff, the models developed in this study predict that angular constraints of at least 14 degrees and 6.5 degrees in the superoinferior and anteroposterior axes are required to provide stable unloaded abduction of the humerus, with larger constraints of 18 degrees and 10 degrees necessitated by a dysfunctional supraspinatus. The tools developed during this study can be used to determine the capacity for different implant designs to provide resistance to excessive glenohumeral translations and reduce the potential for instability of the joint, allowing surgeons to optimize postoperative functional gains on a patient by patient basis.

Arthroplasty, Replacement↗

Glenoid component insertion in total shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of three techniques for drying the glenoid before cementation.

This prospective randomized study compared the immediate postoperative periglenoid radiolucencies among 3 glenoid-drying techniques used in total shoulder arthroplasty. Seventy-one consecutive patients with primary osteoarthritis underwent total shoulder arthroplasty by use of 1 prosthetic system with convex-back, keeled, polyethylene glenoid components; the same modern, instrumented pressurization technique was used to cement all glenoids. Of the shoulders, 21 had glenoid implants cemented after bony preparation with thrombin-soaked gel foam, 24 after compressed gas lavage, and 26 after saline solution lavage with sponge drying. The immediate postoperative anteroposterior radiographs were examined to evaluate the presence of periglenoid radiolucencies. Of the patients, 29 (41%) had radiolucencies evident immediately postoperatively, with all radiolucencies occurring in the faceplate zones. The mean total radiolucent line score was 0.63 (P = .94), with no significant difference among cementing preparation techniques (P = .89). Prosthetic mismatch did not differ among glenoid preparation techniques (P = .86). There was no statistical association between prosthetic mismatch and radiolucent line score either across (P = .62) or within (P = .99) the glenoid preparation groups. The associated costs in the gel foam group and compressed gas lavage group were 70 times higher than the cost in the saline solution lavage group. All radiolucencies were noted in the faceplate zones, with no radiolucency greater than 2 mm. Preparation of the glenoid surface for cementing showed no significant difference among the 3 techniques studied, although the material costs were significantly higher in the gel foam and compressed gas lavage groups compared with the saline solution lavage group.

Arthroplasty, Replacement↗