PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15551855

Comparative performance data for critical access hospitals.

George H Pink·Rebecca T Slifkin·Andrew F Coburn·John A Gale
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

CONTEXT: Among small rural hospitals, there is a growing recognition of the need to measure and report on the use of resources and the safety and quality of the services provided. Dashboards, clinical value compasses, and balanced scorecards are approaches to performance measurement that have been adopted by many health care organizations. However, there exists very little comparative performance data specific for critical access hospitals. PURPOSE: To identify how comparative performance data for critical access hospitals (CPD-CAH) might facilitate performance and quality improvement, to assess the potential benefits and drawbacks of such data, and to identify some of the critical issues in the development and implementation of CPD-CAH. METHODS: Assessment of discussions by participants at a rural hospital performance improvement summit and authors' analyses. FINDINGS: CPD-CAH potentially could improve quality of care and patient outcomes, provide comparative data and benchmarks, inform policy development, facilitate collaboration, and enhance community relations. However, CPD-CAH could also impose an unaffordable cost, produce poor information, require complex coordination, induce a negative public reaction, and result in perverse hospital behavior. Development and implementation of CPD-CAH would require including stakeholders' assessment of its desirability and feasibility, setting objectives, establishing guiding principles, developing a method, collecting and analyzing data, and disseminating results. CONCLUSIONS: CPD-CAH could significantly advance CAH performance and quality improvement. However, development and implementation would be a complicated exercise requiring academic expertise and practitioner consultation. The potential value of CPD-CAH should be carefully weighed against its potential cost.

Explore related subjects

BenchmarkingHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHospitals, RuralHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareRural HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

George H Pink, Rebecca T Slifkin, Andrew F Coburn, John A Gale. 2004. Comparative performance data for critical access hospitals.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00052.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Beyond benchmarking: an expert-guided consensus approach to spatially aware clustering.

Spatial omics technologies have revolutionized the study of tissue architecture and cellular heterogeneity by integrating molecular profiles with spatial localization. In spatially resolved transcriptomics, delineating higher-order anatomical structures is critical for understanding how cellular organization affects function. However, the reliability of current benchmarks of spatially aware clustering (SAC) methods is undermined by their narrow focus on Visium and brain tissue datasets and the incorrect interpretation of manual annotation as ground truth. Here we present SACCELERATOR, a community-driven, extensible framework that standardizes data formatting, method integration and metric evaluation, enabling rapid inclusion of new methods and datasets. Our analysis revealed substantial limitations in the generalizability and reproducibility of SAC methods and shows that anatomical labels commonly used as ground truths are often biased, error prone and unsuitable for benchmarking. Rather than ranking methods, we propose a consensus-guided workflow where descriptive spatial metrics highlight high-entropy regions of method disagreement, enabling targeted feedback for tissue experts. Applied to brain and cancer datasets, this approach uncovered biologically meaningful patterns overlooked by individual SAC methods and manual annotations, highlighting the need for iterative, expert-in-the-loop evaluation.

Benchmarking↗
PubMed2026

Essence: A benchmarking-validated transformer framework for early diagnosis of Parkinson's disease using cerebrospinal fluid protein biomarkers.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms. The lack of objective molecular biomarkers limits early diagnosis and personalized treatment. Here, we propose Essence, a benchmarking-validated framework integrating cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics with traditional and deep learning models to identify robust protein signatures for PD. Using data from two independent cohorts, 1266 high-confidence proteins are quantified, among which 178 exhibit differential abundance between PD and healthy controls (HC). Through systematic benchmarking of ten machine learning algorithms and four neural architectures, the Transformer model consistently outperforms alternatives across multiple feature selection strategies, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 1.0000 with only 35 features. Functional analyses of the top-ranked 35 proteins reveal enrichment in neuroinflammatory, synaptic, and oxidative stress-related pathways. Importantly, spatial transcriptomic profiling based on the Allen Brain Atlas shows region-specific expression of these biomarkers in PD-relevant brain structures, including the striatum, subthalamic nucleus, hippocampus, and white matter tracts. This anatomical alignment supports the functional relevance of the identified markers and highlights their potential utility in early-stage diagnosis and mechanistic understanding of PD.

Benchmarking↗
PubMed2025

Benchmarking with synthetic communities provides a baseline for virus-host inferences from Hi-C proximity linking.

Microbiomes influence diverse ecosystems, and viruses increasingly appear to impose key constraints. While viromics has expanded genomic catalogs, host identification for these viruses remains challenging due to the limitations in scaling cultivation-based approaches and the uncertain reliability and relative low resolution of in silico predictions - particularly for understudied viral taxa. Towards this, Hi-C proximity ligation uses sequenced, cross-linked virus and host genomic fragments to infer virus-host linkages and has now been applied in at least 10 studies. However, its accuracy remains unknown. Here we assess Hi-C performance in recovering virus-host interactions using synthetic communities (SynComs) composed of four marine bacterial strains and nine phages with known interactions and then apply optimized bioinformatic protocols to natural soil samples. In SynComs, standard Hi-C sample preparations and analyses showed poor normalized contact score performance (26% specificity, 100% sensitivity, incorrect matches up to class level) that could be dramatically improved by Z-score filtering (Z ≥ 0.5, 99% specificity), though at reduced sensitivity (62% down from 100%). Detection limits were established as reproducibility was poor below minimal phage abundances of 105 PFU/mL. Applying optimized bioinformatic protocols to natural soil samples, we compared virus-host linkages inferred from proximity-ligated Hi-C sequencing with predictions generated by in silico homology-based and machine learning-based bioinformatic approaches. Prior to Z-score thresholding, agreement was relatively high at the phylum to family levels (72%), but not at the genus (43%) or species (15%) levels. Z-score thresholding reduced sensitivity (only 34% of predictions were retained), with only modest improvements in congruence with bioinformatic methods (48% or 18% at genus or species levels, respectively). Regardless, this led to 79 genus-level-congruent virus-host linkages and 293 new ones revealed by Hi-C alone, i.e., providing many new virus-host interactions to explore in already well-studied climate-critical soils. Overall, these findings provide empirical benchmarks and methodological guidelines to improve the accuracy and reliability of Hi-C for virus-host linkage studies in complex microbial communities.

Benchmarking↗