PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15553056

Lessons learned in implementing SCI clinical practice guidelines.

Abstract

While clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were designed as a tool to improve patient outcomes, decrease practice variation, and optimize resource utilization, providers often encounter significant barriers to integrating these into clinical practice. A study was conducted at six spinal cord injury (SCI) centers in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to improve provider adherence and patient outcomes of two CPGs: Prevention of Thromboembolism in Spinal Cord Injury and Neurogenic Bowel Management in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury. To design effective implementation strategies, focus groups were conducted to identify provider-perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing recommendations for each of the SCI guidelines. Based on this information, four guideline implementation strategies were designed: (a) use of local opinion leaders ("clinical champions"), (b) patient-mediated interventions, (c) standardized documentation template/standing orders, and (d) social marketing/outreach visits. These strategies were implemented at each site. This article identifies "lessons learned" during the process of trying to get these CPGs embedded into clinical practice.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maylou Guihan, Helen T Bosshart, Audrey Nelson. 2004. Lessons learned in implementing SCI clinical practice guidelines.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15553056/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Using enquiry in learning: from vision to reality in higher education.

This paper reports on the contribution of six nurse educators to embed enquiry-led learning in a pre-registration nursing programme. Their focus was to evaluate student and facilitator perspectives of a hybrid model of problem-based learning, a form of enquiry-based learning and to focus on facilitators' perceptions of its longer-term utility with large student groups. Problem-based learning is an established learning strategy in healthcare internationally; however, insufficient evidence of its effectiveness with large groups of pre-registration students exists. Fourth Generation Evaluation was used, applying the Nominal Group Technique and Focus Group interviews, for data collection. In total, four groups representing different branches of pre-registration students (n = 121) and 15 facilitators participated. Students identified seven strengths and six areas for development related to problem-based learning. Equally, analysis of facilitators' discussions revealed several themes related to strengths and challenges. The consensus was that using enquiry aided the development of independent learning and encouraged deeper exploration of nursing and allied subject material. However, problems and frustrations were identified in relation to large numbers of groups, group dynamics, room and library resources and personal development. The implications of these findings for longer-term utility with large student groups are discussed.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Preconception care--when and what: the attitude of Israeli gynaecologists to preconception counseling.

OBJECTIVES: Preconception care is a form of preventive care and its implementation might improve general women's health as well as improving pregnancy outcome. Our aim was to survey the attitudes of Israeli gynecologists regarding preconception counseling. METHODS: E-mailed questionnaires were sent to gynecologists in an Israeli gynecology network. The questionnaire included two identical sets of questions; one was regarding the care of reproductive aged women who visit their gynecologist for various reasons and the second was regarding the care of women in their first prenatal visit. Answers were scored (from 3-always to 0-never), summed and compared using Chi-square and paired t tests. RESULTS: Mean score for the preconception set was significantly lower than the prenatal set 11.3 (62.7%) versus 16.9 (93.7%) respectively, P < 0.001. Folic acid supplementation and genetic screening tests were recommended to most women in 99 and 94% of first prenatal care visit compared to only 42 and 62% of women who were not pregnant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Gynecologists fail to recognize proper opportunities for preconception care. Increased awareness and concrete guidelines concerning timing and content of preconception counseling might be helpful.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗