PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15553316

[Thought styles in nursing].

Abstract

Proceeding from the occupation with the question whether the tension that nursing staffs experience in correspondence with the conflict of theory and practical orientation can be made transparent the authors found no sufficient explanations in the current theories of professionalism. The theory of thought styles and thought collectives (Denkstile und Denkkollektive) of Ludwig Fleck offers a perspective that takes a look at the inside of nursing, at the nursing staffs. From the analysis of the works of Fleck three styles, or thought collectives have been determined, that can be met in nursing. The thought style that corresponds with the pre-professional phase of a nursing career is characterised by a mainly caritative understanding of nursing. The thought style that comes with professional nursing is based on standardised knowledge by experience without scientific foundation. The thought style that is related to a professionalism of nursing connects scientific insights, nursing knowledge by experience and hermeneutic understanding of cases. The consideration of the current situation in nursing shows two problems that can be explained from the perspective of the thought styles: disturbances in communication because of terms that are interpreted differently by different thought styles and resistance against the consequences of some processes of development relating to professional-political aspects of nursing (making nursing academical and more professional). The resulting strategies of action include a further development of a thought style of a professionalism of nursing to be able to deal with needing of care and the reflection of conflict situations on the background of thought collectives.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Roland Brühe, Ruth Rottländer, Sabine Theis. 2004. [Thought styles in nursing].. https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302.17.5.306

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The Age-related Macular Degeneration Alliance International commissioned a review of the literature on quality of life (QoL) in macular degeneration (MD) with a view to increasing awareness of MD, reducing its impact and improving services for people with MD worldwide. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases, conference proceedings and key journal hand search checks. The resulting 'White Paper' was posted on the AMD Alliance website and is reproduced here. REVIEW: MD is a chronic, largely untreatable eye condition which leads to loss of central vision needed for tasks such as reading, watching TV, driving, recognising faces. It is the most common cause of blindness in the Western world. Shock of diagnosis, coupled with lack of information and support are a common experience. Incidence of depression is twice that found in the community-dwelling elderly, fuelled by functional decline and loss of leisure activities. Some people feel suicidal. MD threatens independence, especially when comorbidity exacerbates functional limitations. Rehabilitation, including low vision aid (LVA) provision and training, peer support and education, can improve functional and psychological outcomes but many people do not receive services likely to benefit them. Medical treatments, suitable for only a small minority of people with MD, can improve vision but most limit progress of MD, at least for a time, rather than cure. The White Paper considers difficulties associated with inappropriate use of health status measures and misinterpretation of utility values as QoL measures: evidence suggests they have poor validity in MD. CONCLUSION: There is considerable evidence for the major damage done to QoL by MD which is underestimated by health status and utility measures. Medical treatments are limited to a small proportion of people. However, much can be done to improve QoL by early diagnosis of MD with good communication of prognosis and continuing support. Support could include provision of LVAs, peer support, education and effective help in adjusting to MD. It is vital that appropriate measures of visual function and QoL be used in building a sound evidence base for the effectiveness of rehabilitation and treatment.

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice↗