PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15556495

Separation methods for pharmacologically active xanthones.

Abstract

Xanthones, as a kind of polyphenolic natural products with many strong bioactivities, are attractive for separation scientists due to the similarity and diversity of their structures resulting in difficult separation by chromatographic methods. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and thin layer chromatography (TLC) are traditional methods to separate xanthones. Recently, capillary electrophoresis (CE), as a micro-column technique driven by electroosmotic flow (EOF), with its high efficiency and high-speed separation, has been employed to separate xanthones and determine their physicochemical properties such as binding constants with cyclodextrin (CD) and ionization constants. Since xanthones have been used in clinic treatment, the development of chromatographic and CE methods for the separation and determination of xanthones plays an essential role in the quality control of some herbal medicines containing xanthones. This article reviewed the separation of xanthones by HPLC, TLC and CE, citing 72 literatures. This review focused on the CE separation for xanthones due to its unique advantages compared to chromatographic methods. The comparison of separation selectivity of different CE modes including capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), microemulsion electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MEEKC) and capillary electrochromatography (CEC) was discussed. Compared with traditional chromatographic methods such as HPLC and TLC, CE has higher separation efficiency, faster separation, lower cost and more flexible modes. However, because of low sensitivity of UV detector and low contents of xanthones in herbal medicines, CE methods have seldom been applied to the analysis of real samples although CE showed great potential for xanthone separation. The determination of xanthones in herbal medicines has been often achieved by HPLC. Hence, how to enhance CE detection sensitivity for real sample analysis, e.g. by on-line preconcentration and CE-MS, would be a key to achieve the quantitation of xanthones.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tao Bo, Huwei Liu. 2004-12-05. Separation methods for pharmacologically active xanthones.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.08.009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Determination of low levels of perchlorate in lettuce and spinach using ion chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (IC-ESI-MS).

A sample preparation method was developed to quantify environmentally relevant (low micrograms per liter) concentrations of perchlorate (ClO4(-)) in leafy vegetables using IC-ESI-MS. Lettuce and spinach were macerated, centrifuged, and filtered, and the aqueous extracts were rendered water-clear using a one-step solid-phase extraction method. Total time for extraction and sample preparation was 6 h. Ion suppression was demonstrated and was likely due to unknown organics still present in the extract solution after cleanup. However, this interference was readily eliminated using a Cl(18)O4(-) internal standard at 1 microg/L in all standards and samples. Hydroponically grown perchlorate-free butterhead lettuce was spiked to either 10.3 or 37.7 microg/kg of fresh weight (FW), and recoveries were between 91 and 98% and between 93 and 101%, respectively. Five types of lettuce and spinach from a local grocery store were then analyzed; they contained from 0.6 to 6.4 microg/kg of FW. Spike recoveries using the store-bought samples ranged from 89 to 100%. The method detection limit for perchlorate in plant extracts is 40 ng/L, and the corresponding minimum reporting limit is 200 ng/L or 0.8 microg/kg of FW.

Chromatography↗

Evaluation of CD detection in an HPLC system for analysis of DHEA and related steroids.

The biological importance of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is reflected by the fact that DHEA is a crucial precursor of the biosynthesis of the steroidal sex hormones. Simultaneous separation of DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), pregnenolone, androstenedione and testosterone has been accomplished by reversed-phase ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-IP-HPLC) based on isocratic elution applying circular dichroism (CD) detection at 295 nm. Addition of tetrabutylammonium hydrogensulfate to the mobile phase increases the retention of DHEA-S on the C8-silica column by an apparent ion-pairing mechanism without affecting the retention of the other (non-ionic) steroids. CD spectroscopy provides highly selective detection of compounds possessing optically active absorption bands and the separation is even more selective in the higher wavelength range applied. The linearity of the steroid concentration (c, mg mL(-1)) versus peak area was tested in the concentration range of 0.5-2 mg mL(-1) (injected quantities were 10-40 microg). The relative standard deviation (RSD) values for DHEA and DHEA-S indicated a good intra-assay and inter-assay precision of the method.

Chromatography↗

In situ probing of insulin aggregation in chromatography effluents with spectroturbidimetry.

Probing protein aggregation in situ is quite important for analyzing and developing chromatographic protein purification processes. A spectroturbidimetry method with a photodiode array detector is developed and tested for probing insulin aggregation in solution and determining the aggregation number, n(m). All aggregates examined are in the Rayleigh light scattering regime, where the turbidity between 400 and 350 nm is proportional to lambda(-4). Insulin at 25 degrees C in 3.5 N acetic acid is mainly monomeric (non-aggregated). At 25 degrees C and lower acetic acid concentrations, from 0.1 to 1 N, the average insulin aggregation number n(m) ranges from 2.9 to 1.6. Aggregates, with n(m) = 2-3, are found in 2.6 N acetic acid with 20 vol% acetonitrile. In 0.8 N acetic acid with 20 vol% denatured ethanol, n(m) = 1.2. At 4 degrees C, as acetic acid concentration decreases from 3.5 to 0.1 N, n(m) decreases from 2.4 to 1.8. In 2.8 N acetic acid with 20 vol% denatured ethanol at 4 degrees C, insulin exists mainly in monomer form. In situ probing of size exclusion chromatography, SEC, effluents in 3.5 N acetic acid at 4 degrees C shows n(m) = 1.6 at the fronting portion (a mixture of monomers and dimers or other oligomers) and n(m) = 1.1 (mostly monomers) at the tailing portion of the main peak. In another example, for LysPro-insulin in reversed phase chromatography at 4 degrees C, complex elution patterns and broad peaks are due to substantial aggregation. For a linear gradient of acetonitrile from 10 to 60 vol% at 4 degrees C, n(m) ranges from 2.2 to 12, in order of elution. For a linear gradient of ethanol from 30 to 50 vol% at 4 degrees C, n(m) ranges from 14 to 27, in order of elution. Analytical HPLC results at 25 degrees C imply that the aggregates are reversible.

Chromatography↗