PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15564341

The INTERHEART study: intersection between behavioral and general medicine.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David S Sheps, Nancy Frasure-Smith, Kenneth E Freedland, Robert M Carney. The INTERHEART study: intersection between behavioral and general medicine.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000147479.29050.0a

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The rate and variation of referrals to behavioral medicine services for patients reporting poor mental health in the national spine network.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive analysis of cross-sectional data collected prospectively in 20 National Spine Network (NSN) centers. OBJECTIVES: First, to summarize clinical and demographic characteristics of patients likely to need servicesfor psychosocial concerns. Second, to determine the rate and variability of referrals for behavioral medicine interventions (BMED) across the NSN. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The prevalence of mental distress resulting from or coexisting with spinal pain is unclear. There is evidence that psychological treatments, particularly BMED, can aid the recovery of patients with symptoms of mental distress. METHODS: From 1998 to 2001, 28,349 patients presenting to NSN centers completed the SF-36 General Health Survey. Patients were dichotomized by the mental component summary (MCS) score into two groups: 1) those scoring 35. Clinicians recorded a "treatment plan" comprised of a standard array of treatment options. For patients scoring <or=35 on the MCS, the rate and variation of referrals to BMED was assessed. RESULTS: Baseline health status scores were lower across all SF-36 scales for the patients scoring an MCS <or= 35. For mentally distressed patients, the overall average referral rate for any BMED service for patients scoring MCS <or= 35 was 11.8%. The rate varied across NSN sites from 0 to 41%. CONCLUSION: With only 11.8% of mentally distressed NSN patients receiving a referral for any form of BMED, it appears that a large proportion of eligible patients are not receiving a potentially beneficial treatment. Wide variation across centers may indicate an inability to adequately assess mental distress via the usual clinical interview and examination for spinal conditions or a lack of consensus regarding BMED's availability and utility.

Behavioral Medicine↗

The relevance of medical sociology to psychiatry: a historical view.

Collaboration between sociology and psychiatry is traced to the 1920s when, stimulated by Harry Stack Sullivan and Adolph Meyer, the relationship was activated by common theoretical and research interests. Immediately after World War II, this became a true partnership, stimulated by the National Institute of Mental Health, the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, and the growing influence of psychoanalytic theory. The effects of a sociology that focused on issues of health and illness proceeded to grow in medical education, research, and the treatment of mental illness until 1980, when a distinct shift of emphasis in psychiatry occurred. In its role as educator of future physicians, postwar psychiatry developed a paradigm of biopsychosocial behavior but, after 3 decades, changed to a biopharmacological model. The definition of mental illness as a deviant extreme in developmental and interpersonal characteristics lost favor to nosological diagnoses of discrete or dichotomous models. Under a variety of intellectual, socioeconomic, and political pressures, psychiatry reduced its interest in and relationship with sociology, replacing it in part with bioethics and economics. In this article, the detailed underpinnings of these changes are described and interpreted.

Behavioral Medicine↗