PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15580470

[Diet and multiple sclerosis].

Abstract

Beneficial effects from any particular diet have not been proven in multiple sclerosis (MS). Therefore, the general guidelines on nutrition should be followed. Obesity and various forms of malnutrition worsening the MS symptoms are frequently observed. There is some evidence from epidemiological studies that a high consumption of saturated animal fat is associated with an increased incidence of MS. The findings from such studies indicate that supplementation with unsaturated fatty acids, in particular omega-3 fatty acids, could positively influence the course of MS. However, controlled studies did not show clear beneficial effects from polyunsaturated fatty acids. The intake of vitamin D is associated with a lower incidence of MS. In contrast, the effects of therapy with vitamin D on the course of MS have not been ascertained. Patients with MS carry an enormous risk of osteoporosis, and therefore the indication for a preventive therapy with vitamin D and calcium should be established in every postmenopausal woman or after repeated steroid treatments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Schwarz, H Leweling. 2005. [Diet and multiple sclerosis].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-004-1783-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Health economics studies in dermatology].

Because of reduced resources for health care, provision of modern effective dermatologic care for patients with German public health insurances has become more and more difficult. This survey is designed to aid in the assessment of published health economic studies as well as encourage participation in health economic evaluations. These studies should analyze and optimize the allocation of the available resources. Four main approaches can be used to calculate the incidental expenses; they differ in their methods of evaluation and assessment of health services. They all offer methods to calculate the anticipated costs and consequences. The methods include cost minimization analysis (CMA), cost effectiveness analysis (CEA), cost utility analysis (CUA) or cost benefit analysis (CBA). Many subgroups also exist. Important criteria for the evaluation of health economic trials and hints for the publication of the results are provided on the basis of the recommendations for health economic evaluations.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

A framework for two-stage adaptive procedures to simultaneously test non-inferiority and superiority.

In clinical trials it is often desirable to test for non-inferiority and for superiority simultaneously. For such a situation a two-stage adaptive procedure may be advantageous to a conventional single-stage procedure because a two-stage adaptive procedure allows the design of stage II, including the main study objective and sample size, to depend on the outcome of stage I. We propose a framework for designing two-stage adaptive procedures with a possible switch of the primary study objectives at the end of stage I between non-inferiority and superiority. The framework permits control of the type I error rate and specification of the unconditional powers and maximum sample size for each of non-inferiority and superiority objectives. The actions at the end of stage I are predetermined as functions of the stage I observations, thus making specification of the unconditional powers possible. Based on the results at the end of stage I, the primary objective for stage II is chosen, and sample sizes and critical values for stage II are determined.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗